I feel that the current winter test is a bit tasteless, the previous winter test is very good, but this year's is inevitably a little too sloppy, the data alone is a little wrong, in the case of minus 40 degrees, ask the world M7 and Lynk & Co 08 directly from the penultimate and second-to-last, and the results of the two cars are several times different from the first place, this value, a little wrong.
The first is the type of battery, both cars are ternary lithium batteries, which have been tested by many institutions before, and the performance of the battery is better than that of lithium iron phosphate batteries under endurance and cold conditions, especially Lynk & Co 08, There is also SOC power adjustment technology itself, normally speaking, the performance of the two cars is not how good, at least the results of the top few cars should be about the same, in this case, can it be said that the power consumption of these two hybrid cars is several times that of other models, I really don't believe it.
There is also a question about the involvement of the Lynk & Co 08 engine, which is a test in the extreme environment, whether there should be an engineer who is familiar with the performance structure of the car during driving, whether the tester really understands the performance of the car, or whether the second test is needed according to the situation after an engine intervention, so the scribbled pure electric endurance results are indeed a bit excessive.