In the midst of war in the Middle East, Israel is locked in an unprecedented two-pronged situation, with Allah and the Houthis putting the small country's economy and security in jeopardy. The war escalated, and fierce clashes broke out between Israel and Allah in Lebanon, and the border area became a battlefield filled with gunsmoke. At the same time, the Houthis have put them in a double predicament by blocking the Red Sea, threatening Israel's economic lifeline. In this time of crisis, Israel is doing everything in its power to contain the superpower, the United States, in an attempt to win its military and political support.
America's hesitation to get involved in a Middle East war has left Israel's plans uncertain. This article will delve into this geopolitical chess game, revealing Israel's motives behind its attempt to "pull America into the water" and the role of the United States in this conflicting Middle East situation. At this juncture, the world will witness a game that will affect the future of the Middle East.
Israel's attempt to woo the United States for external support has not been easy. The cautious attitude of the United States may have dashed Israel's chances of survival, and such a move has caused waves on the international stage. On the one hand, Israel is trying to turn the tide with the power of the United States, but on the other hand, it also means that they may be drawn into deeper international strife. In the era of globalization, war is no longer an isolated event, but a trigger that affects the whole body, and Israel's game may arouse more attention and questions in the international community.
As a small country, Israel has many hostile forces and threats in the surrounding area. In several conflicts, notably after the escalation of fighting in Syria and the Gaza Strip, Israel has found itself under pressure from enemies from both directions. This undoubtedly poses a great challenge to them.
One of the problems to be said is the distraction of the Israeli army. Continuous, long-lasting, large-scale, and high-intensity operations can lead to fatigue and nervousness among soldiers, and weaken their ability to assess risk and judge when holding their positions and performing tasks, which may lead to fatigue and boredom in some soldiers, affecting their morale and performance. This kind of distraction will not only have a direct impact on the combat capability of individual soldiers, but may also lead to the destabilization of the entire army and even the whole country.
The second problem is that the chain of command is in disarray. In the face of threats from both directions, Israel needs to respond to the situation with a high degree of coordination and effective leadership, and to ensure a smooth flow of information between commanders at all levels. In practice, Israel has found its chain of command in a state of disarray due to the large and complex intelligence data, the frequent and high-risk emergency decision-making, and the high level of risk. This makes it difficult to coordinate and react quickly, and further exacerbates the decline in combat effectiveness.
In the midst of the fierce confrontation between Hamas and Israel, a shocking ** episode revealed the feats of a group of Hamas soldiers known as the "Qassam Brigades" who successfully crossed Israeli positions with unbelievable barefoot infiltration tactics.
* The barefoot fighters of the "Qassam Brigade" carefully crossed the Gaza border, easily penetrating Israeli lines, and carrying out deadly attacks, demonstrating astonishing tactical ingenuity. This is not only a flexible response to a tunnel war, but also a successful capture of the Israeli army by the "Underground Serpent" in an unexpected way, and gradually contend with Israel in terms of "Israeli" combat readiness.
The clever use of the tactics of tunnel networks has brought a double contest between the ground and the underground to the war, ushering in an era of innovation in war thinking. The use of this authentic tactics not only performed well in actual combat, but also challenged the concept of communication. Hamas's "snake underground" tactic has enabled Israel to no longer only face the enemy on the field, but also face the threat from the underground.
Does the success of tunnel warfare mean that all means are advisable?Hamas's success has also raised the controversial question of whether ethical boundaries should be more strictly observed in war
Hamas's success through authentic tactics, while demonstrating its tactical brilliance, has also violated the internationally accepted rules of war to a certain extent. In the course of the raid, they ignore friend and foe, and the purpose is clear but the means are cruel. Whether this tactic, which is successful in real combat, means its legitimacy, has become a moral dilemma that requires deep thought.
Despite Hamas's obvious outpuff in equipment, it is through this nimble tactic of defeating the strong that Hamas has repeatedly performed miracles on the battlefield in Gaza. The flexible use of tunnel tactics has enabled Hamas to frequently win in confrontations with Israel, capturing a large number of enemies**. This has put Israel, which has always prided itself on being well-armed, into a serious passive situation.
Although the Israeli army has obvious advantages in technology and equipment, these advantages are greatly reduced by the concealment of tunnel warfare. In this situation of skillful combination of equipment and tactics, Israel is obviously in the embarrassing situation of being beaten passively. At this time, the superiority of equipment did not give Hamas the initiative to win the battlefield, but provided Hamas with more opportunities to carry out surprise attacks.