Author |Sister Comb.
It's the end of the year again, and now all levels are busiest to meet and cope with all kinds of inspections and assessments.
Since it is an inspection and assessment, it is necessary to come up with some bars, otherwise it will not be able to reflect the authority and fairness of the assessment.
This kind of thing is difficult for those elites sitting in the office, who exhaust all their talents and can always design a set of extravagant assessment standards to make the grassroots uncomfortable and the leaders satisfied.
School examinations are generally a 100-point system, but how can 100 points meet the needs of fine management, many fields, many places have come up with a "1,000-point system", and even the "1,000-point system" is not yet enjoyable, and a "double 1,000-point system" has been created, and it is estimated that the "10,000-point system" and "100,000-point system" will become a reality in the near future.
Recently, the "Half Moon Talk" published an article pointing out that grassroots cadres are overwhelmed by the variety of indicators and the variety of names, and we should be vigilant against formalistic indicators trapping grassroots cadres.
The "thousand-point system" is the baton, that is, the weather vane, with a thick pile of ** and then with the developed information system to test the below, the following must be compared with the whole data, do **, make traces, and do a good job of the surface article.
Some people may say that this is obviously engaging in formalism and blatant falsification, don't they know?
In fact, who doesn't know, but who dares not to do this, if you don't assess, do not evaluate, you will be deducted as lazy government, if the assessment is too extensive and simple, it will not be able to put all kinds of contradictions, so the "thousand-point system" is the best means to throw the pot, can avoid risks to the greatest extent.
For the following, it is clear that the superiors are blindly directing the disorderly acts, and they have to nod their heads and cooperate with them, because these evaluations are directly linked to the performance of the main leaders, and the days after not getting good scores will be difficult, and some evaluations are very closely related to interests, and they are even more sloppy.
For example, in a county to meet the rural revitalization assessment, they mobilized many departments to prepare various materials all night, and organized a large number of people to accompany the inspection team, the purpose is to be able to pass the test smoothly, because after passing the assessment, it means that there will be hundreds of millions of yuan of financial allocation.
This mode of work has continued to the village and community, and one cadre stationed in the village complained that every day there is an endless supply of materials, endless tables, and endless inspection teams, which is busier than working in the organs.
It is extremely abnormal that work at the village and community level is institutionalized. Of course, all abnormal work will be Xi and not strange.
The harm brought by the overwhelming formalism is far more than just the immediate situation, and will have a deep impact on the young people of today.
A few years later, when those who created and implemented the "thousand-point system" took leadership positions, their minds and cognitions only had **, only data, only formalism, and no other skills.
In opposing formalism, we must not just shout, but must take some action, such as whether all kinds of appraisal and creation can be cut, whether all kinds of 1,000-point systems and double 1,000-point systems can be abolished, and let all those who engage in appraisal and tossing stand aside for a while, and truly return rights, energy, and freedom to the grassroots frontline.
Of course, some people will worry about loosening it as soon as it is released, in case of loss of assessment supervision and inspection, what to do if they do not do anything, and what to do if they don't work?
What are you afraid of, there are ordinary people staring at it.
The greatest responsibility of grassroots cadres is to be responsible to the subordinates and to the people, as long as the people are satisfied, everything else is superfluous.
Therefore, there is still a lot of room for streamlining the administration of the elite army, that is, first slimming down, first cutting down the high-ranking organs and departments, so that they lose the qualification to toss, and then handing over the right of supervision and evaluation to the people, and using the people's satisfaction and happiness as indicators for evaluation.
It is necessary to believe that the common people have the ability to exercise their rights well and to supervise front-line public officials at the grassroots level.
In addition, for grassroots public officials, serving the people is their core value, and just pandering to and currying favor with them all day long will also make them lose their basic professional dignity.
If we have to conduct an assessment and a thousand-point system, then it is very simple, we should take the test from the bottom up, let the people score the grassroots cadres, and the grassroots cadres give the higher-level leaders and organs a score, and see how many practical things they have done and how much service work they have done in the past year, do they dare to do this?
It can be said unceremoniously that all the "thousand-point system" is not a good thing, and if this thing is not completely eradicated, formalism will always be ghostly.
In a word, recuperation needs to be the source of chaos, absolute obedience needs to be loosened, service and humility need to be strengthened, and flashy utilitarianism needs to be eliminated.