Eleven days after the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, Israel and Palestine reached a ceasefire, which has aroused widespread concern around the world. In this conflict, Israel has been overwhelmingly in control of the situation, but in such a situation, it has chosen to stop the attack. What are the multiple considerations for this?
Strategic shift and overwhelming advantage.
Israel has fully seized the initiative, and it is no longer necessary to pursue Hamas. The elimination of Hamas does not change the perception of Palestinians towards Israel, which is not in line with Israel's strategic objectives. On the contrary, Israel only needs to demonstrate absolute military superiority, which is enough. Moreover, if the military operation continues, Israel will not be able to guarantee 100% victory, and the burden of responding to subsequent asymmetric attacks will be unbearable.
External threats and multi-front operational considerations.
During the conflict, rocket attacks from Lebanon posed a great threat to Israel. If Israel were to open a new front, it would have to face a more complex situation on multiple fronts. Despite its strength, it is difficult to predict the outcome of a multi-front battle, so Israel is reluctant to take such a risk.
Diplomatic considerations and international relations.
As an important player in the Middle East, Israel needs to take into account the attitude of the United States. Receiving huge amounts of military aid every year, Israel must not offend the United States. In the UN vote, the United States voted against it, which wiped face on Israel internationally. Israel cannot sacrifice its own interests and touch the bottom line of the United States.
Maintain international image and humanitarianism.
It was not a military conflict at first, but Hamas's rocket attacks forced Israel to act. However, Israel's strikes will almost certainly affect Palestinian civilians. The inhumane ** provokes international condemnation, so Israel must stop acting to preserve its image and avoid becoming an international demon.
Regional security and political considerations.
The Arab world as a whole strongly condemns Israel, making it imperative for Israel to take this factor into account. Despite the norm in the fight against Hamas, it cannot be compared with Iran. Containing Iran is a top priority, and it is not appropriate to dwell on the Palestinians. Israel must preserve its relations with the Arab world and allow it to continue to work together against Iran.
Strategic long-term and international intervention.
Israel, even if it was strong, could not resolve the question of Palestine quickly and could only gradually occupy the territory. In view of the complex situation in the Middle East, Israel must stop the conflict at the right time. The ceasefire took into account a variety of factors and gave the United Nations enough face.
Israel's choice of conflict strategy is a comprehensive manifestation of multiple factors such as politics, military affairs, and diplomacy. The political tactics and strategic orientation revealed by this conflict are not only confined to Palestine and Israel, but also have a bearing on stability and security in the Middle East.
The above-mentioned articles on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict have raised multiple viewpoints and have had a far-reaching impact on the situation in the Middle East and international relations. This conflict is not only a manifestation of internal contradictions in the region, but also a comprehensive reflection of the political, diplomatic, and military strategies of various countries.
First, the article points out the multiple factors that Israel has chosen for a ceasefire in the conflict. Despite Israel's overwhelming military superiority, its choice to halt the attack was not weak, but strategic. At the strategic level, the pursuit of Hamas is not in Israel's long-term interests, because eliminating Hamas will not change the Palestinian perception of Israel. The flexibility and rational consideration of such a strategy are essential to safeguard the long-term interests of the country.
Secondly, the article mentions the consideration of external threats and multi-front operations. Rocket attacks in the Lebanese direction pose a substantial threat to Israel. In the face of this threat, Israel is reluctant to risk fighting on multiple fronts, because the consequences are unpredictable. This reflects the cautious decision-making of the state in a military conflict, taking into account not only military strength, but also the assessment of external threats and ***
In addition, the article touches on the consideration of Israel's relationship with the United States. As an important ally of Israel, the attitude and support of the United States are of paramount importance to Israel. Israel has considered the interests and face of the United States in the ceasefire, which reflects the wisdom and strategy of the country at the diplomatic level.
In addition, the article mentions Israel's international image and humanitarian considerations. Israel is aware of the potential harm inflicted on Palestinian civilians in the conflict, which would seriously damage its international image. Therefore, in order to avoid becoming the target of international criticism, Israel has chosen to stop its military operations in order to maintain its image in the international community.
To sum up, the article points out the rational decisions made by Israel in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. These decisions take into account a variety of factors, including strategic interests, external threats, diplomatic relations, and international image. This is not only a regional conflict, but also a manifestation of the political wisdom and strategic choices of various countries, which has a far-reaching impact on the stability and security of the Middle East.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!