The cash-out methods of the actual controller are endless, and the new regulations are only one of the restrictions. The actual controller of Camellia shares plans to have a 22% stake, and the company has lost money for two consecutive years, which has aroused doubts among shareholders. However, after carefully reading the new regulations, it is found that the actual controller's behavior is not in violation of the rules, which makes people sigh that shareholders are always the passive party.
The actual controller of Camellia shares intends to transfer the equity by agreement, which completely circumvents the restrictions of the new regulations. Even if it doesn't seem to be in violation, this behavior can be considered cash-out. Chen Chongjun, the actual controller of Guao Technology, has cashed out through various means, such as collective bidding, block trading, agreement transfer and judicial auction, etc., to cleverly circumvent the constraints of the new regulations.
Public data shows that Chen's shareholding has decreased from nearly 39% in the IPO in 2016 to 23 percent today7%, and nearly 24% of the equity has been cashed out, with an amount of up to 800 million. These cases highlight the ingenious methods of the actual controllers to cash out, and also raise concerns about equity supervision. The actual controller of Camellia shares intends to **22% of the equity, which has aroused heated discussions in the market.
Although the company has lost money for two consecutive years, the actual controller's behavior is outside the scope of the new regulations. After carefully studying the new regulations, people found that the actual controller's behavior did not violate the rules, which also made people sigh that shareholders are always a passive party. The actual controller of Camellia shares plans to transfer the equity through an agreement, and this ingenious circumvention behavior makes people question, even if it is not in violation, does this mean that it will not cash out?
Chen Chongjun, the actual controller of Guao Technology, cleverly cashed out through various means. Since the lifting of the ban in 2019, Chen Chongjun has used collective bidding, block trading, agreement transfer, and judicial auction to cash out, circumventing the constraints of the new regulations. According to public data, Chen Chongjun's shareholding ratio has cashed out nearly 24% of the equity, with an amount of up to 800 million.
This ingenious cash-out method makes people wonder whether the regulatory authorities have negligence in the arbitrage behavior of the actual controller, and how to better regulate the behavior of the actual controller. The arbitrage behavior of the actual controller has aroused concern about equity supervision. Although the new regulations have certain restrictions on the actual controller's behavior in the secondary market, in practice, the actual controller can still circumvent the restrictions and arbitrage through various means.
The regulatory authorities shall strengthen the supervision of the actual controller's behavior, improve relevant provisions, prevent the actual controller from using various loopholes and means to cash out, and protect the legitimate rights and interests of the majority of investors. On this issue, what do you think of the arbitrage behavior of the actual controller?How do you think the regulatory authorities should regulate the behavior of the actual controller?Welcome to leave a message to discuss.