School district housing, which once made people crazy about buying a house, is now facing unprecedented challenges. From Shanghai to Shenzhen, from Beijing to Guangzhou, school district housing in first-tier cities has fallen sharply, even by more than 30%. It's the end of an era and a major shock to the school district housing market. In Shanghai, for example, housing prices in the Zhujiatan community have been declining since last year. The house price has dropped from 150,000 to 780,000, a drop of 48%. In other words, if you bought a house for 8 million two years ago, it has fallen by more than 3.8 million now. Shanghai is not alone, Yangpu Miyun Community, Meiyuan New Village School District, etc. are facing a similar situation. The school district housing market in Shenzhen, Beijing, Guangzhou and other cities is facing a similar dilemma. So, why is there such a big drop in school district housing?First of all, there is a surplus of housing in school districts in first-tier cities. In recent years, with the change of population flow and urban planning, the number of school district housing in first-tier cities has increased significantly, while the demand has not grown synchronously, resulting in oversupply and natural decline.
Second, policy regulation has also had an impact on the school district housing market. The implementation of policies such as purchase restrictions and sales restrictions has limited the purchasing power of home buyers and further reduced the cost of housing in the school district. In addition, with the more balanced educational resources, the attractiveness of school district housing has gradually diminished. In the past, people bought school district houses mainly for their children to be able to attend good schools nearby, but nowadays, the sharing of high-quality educational resources has become a trend, no matter where they are, as long as there are good educational resources, parents can let their children receive a good education, so the demand for school district housing by buyers has also decreased accordingly. So, does the collapse of the school district's housing market mean a boon for home buyers?Not really. Although the ** of school district housing has declined, the loss is huge for those who have already purchased school district housing. Especially for those buyers who bought at the high point, their property value has evaporated by nearly half, which is undoubtedly a huge blow to them. Experts have given different views on the future trend of the school district housing market.
Some people believe that with the further equalization of educational resources, the school district housing market will continueSome people believe that the trend of the school district housing market will be temporarily stopped, because there is still a lot of population influx in first-tier cities, and there is still a demand for scarce school district housing resources. In any case, the sharp drop in the school district's housing market has given us a warning: you can't blindly follow the rules when buying a house, and you must make a choice based on your own needs and actual situation. The balanced development of educational resources is the trend of the times, and we should pay attention to the quality of children's education, rather than just pursuing the location and ** of the school district. After all, a truly high-quality education has nothing to do with school district housing, and we should provide children with a broader space for development. References: 1Yangpu Miyun School District housing fell in the forefront of the city, and investors bid farewell to the era of "school district housing". Sina Real Estate. December 15, 2021. 2.The collapse of school district housing in first-tier cities is the tranquility before the storm or the prelude to change?Caijing.com. December 15, 2021. 3.The school district housing collapsed, and the balanced development of educational resources is the general trend. Phoenix.com.
December 15, 2021. School district housing, the "fragrant bait" in the city, sells at a sky-high price, which is staggering. But behind this is the scarcity and inequality of high-quality educational resources. In Beijing, there are only 5,000 students in high-quality primary schools, but the potential demand is 160,000. The school district room has become the ticket to the famous school, and the ** of this ticket has discouraged many people. This phenomenon is not only in Beijing, but can also be seen in major cities across the country. The popularity of school district housing has triggered people's thinking and reflection on educational resources, should we accept this inequality for the sake of quality education?The ** of the school district room is staggering, but in fact, this is just a manifestation of the scarcity of high-quality educational resources. In Beijing, there are only 5,000 places in high-quality primary schools, far from meeting the potential needs of 160,000 students. The school district has become the object of many parents' pursuit, and this chase has also discouraged many ordinary families. They have no choice but to send their children to "ordinary" schools, and this choice often means that there is an imbalance in educational resources.
Because for a family, the future of their children is the most important thing, and they will not hesitate to spend a huge amount of money just to be able to give their children a better education. However, is it really worth it for the school district?Some people will say that the school district is the best because of its geographical location, and this superiority is also reflected in the children's education. But is that really the case?Not exactly. First of all, the imbalance of educational resources will lead to the housing prices of school district housing being overhyped. Secondly, even within the same school, quality educational resources do not only come from teachers and facilities, but also from the communication and interaction between students. If parents send their children to prestigious schools just to choose a school district room, and do not care about their children's real school Xi, then such a choice may not be wise. We need to think deeply and reflect on the imbalance of educational resources. **We should increase investment in educational resources so that more students can receive high-quality education.
At the same time, parents should also wake up to the fact that they should not choose school district housing just for face and status, but should really pay attention to their children's learning and Xi. Quality educational resources should not be just the privilege of a few, but the right that every child should have. We need to work to eliminate this inequality so that every child has the opportunity to receive a quality education and reach the pinnacle of their own life. Does the collapse of school district housing mean that China's education system will also usher in a major change?China's unequal distribution of educational resources has long been criticized, and the popularity of school district housing has exacerbated this injustice to a certain extent. And now, the signs of school district housing ** also show that the pace of reform is gradually approaching. In the short term, the impact of the overall downturn in the real estate market is obvious, and the school district housing is no longer as stable as Mount Tai. In the medium term, the logic of school district housing is also changing, and strengthening regulation and control has also increased the risk of investing in school district housing. In the longer term, whether the distribution of resources in China's education will be more balanced is also the focus of attention of all parties.
Looking back at the distribution of educational resources in China in the past few decades, it is not difficult to find that key middle schools, junior high schools, and primary schools are important reasons for the uneven distribution of educational resources. For a long time, the distribution of educational resources in China has been unequal, with the rich going to school and the poor going to the countryside. The existence of school district housing further exacerbates this inequality, making education "money-oriented". However, as society is increasingly concerned about the unfair distribution of educational resources, ** has begun to strengthen the adjustment of school district housing in an attempt to break this inequality. For example, in 2021, Shanghai began to pilot the "comprehensive evaluation and admission of quota allocation" method to make the distribution of educational resources more equitable. And in Shenzhen, ** also tried to restrict school district housing by changing the enrollment system**. It is foreseeable that in the future, more measures will be taken to limit the investment risk of school district housing and promote a more balanced distribution of China's educational resources.
It is worth noting that although the school district housing has been declining, the inequality in the distribution of educational resources has not been completely eliminated. There is still a huge gap in the distribution of urban and rural education resources in China, and while the distribution of urban education resources is more equitable, it is more necessary to strengthen investment in education resources in rural areas. Only by achieving a balanced distribution of educational resources between urban and rural areas can China's education be more equitable and every child has the opportunity to receive a good education. Therefore, on the issue of uneven distribution of educational resources, the collapse of school district housing is only the beginning, and more measures need to be taken to promote the process of equitable distribution of educational resources. Only by achieving a fair distribution of educational resources can China's next generation have a better future. School District Housing: The Abandonment and Transformation of the TimesSchool District Housing was once a highly sought-after "sweet spot", and its value was regarded as an unshakable symbol. However, with the gradual balance and transfer of educational resources, the value foundation of school district housing has begun to shake, and its impact on the future development of education should also attract our attention.
Over the past few years, the number of kindergartens and elementary schools has been declining as the number of births nationwide has gradually decreased, a trend that indicates a decline in demand for housing in school districts in the future. At the same time, with the gradual balance and distribution of educational resources, the monopoly of school district housing on educational resources will gradually weaken, and its status and value will also gradually weaken. In the past decade or so, the rise of school district housing has brought too much magic and negative effects. Some parents do not hesitate to break the bank and buy a school district house for their children, pushing housing prices to skyrocketing peaks. At the same time, some people also do not hesitate to obtain school district housing resources through various means in order to climb the purpose of nearby schooling, resulting in some children losing fair access to school. However, the short-lived performance of school district housing is not only the balance and transfer of educational resources, but also the high attention and attention of the society to education. Nowadays, parents have begun to gradually realize that education is not just about school district housing, but should pay more attention to their children's all-round development and future career planning, and put the choice of educational resources in a more comprehensive and diversified consideration.
In addition, with the rise of distance education and education, the allocation and coverage of educational resources will also be further expanded. This will provide more comprehensive and equitable educational resources for more districts and families, thereby reducing the monopoly and control of educational resources by school districts. In short, the value and status of school district housing has begun to waver, and its future development also needs to find a new path and direction in a more comprehensive and equitable distribution of educational resources. Only in this way can we better promote the development and progress of education and build a better future for the next generation.