Regularly update the "practical" information to bring you different views and values, thank you for your attention!
Some time ago, Hicks, deputy leader of the US Department of Defense, was visiting the Science and Technology Innovation DepartmentHeartland – Silicon Valleymade a point.
She thinksTo succeed in the competition with China, close cooperation between the military and Silicon Valley is crucial.
She expects cutting-edge technology companies in Silicon Valley to be able toOne step ahead in R&D and construction, and orders from the US military may not come until later.
In this regard,Some drone manufacturers are skepticaland questioned the clarity of the order.
This episode not only exposes the actual situation of the interaction between the United States and the private high-tech field, but also touches on a more complex economic issue.
First, from an economic point of view, a company's investment decisions are based on the expectation of future earnings.
In the absence of clear order guarantees, there is a greater risk for enterprises to invest in the construction of factories on their own.
This risk is mainly reflected in the long capital cycle and high uncertainty.
Especially in the high-tech field, R&D and production costs are usually very high, and without the guarantee of orders, enterprises may face huge economic losses.
Secondly, this incident also reflects the role and responsibility of the private sector in military-industrial cooperation.
In the traditional military-industrial cooperation model, orders are usually placed first, and then R&D and production are carried out by enterprises.
This model can reduce the risk of enterprises and ensure the continuity and stability of military R&D.
However, if this model is changed,Requiring companies to invest first may lead to many companies being reluctant to participate due to the high level of risk.
In addition, this incident also involves the relationship between ** and the market.
In a market economy system,The role should be to create a level playing field, rather than intervening directly in the market.
If a business is asked to invest without providing explicit order support, this may be seen as an interference with the market mechanism.
To sum up, the U.S. side hopes that Silicon Valley companies will invest first without order guaranteesIt not only involves the risk assessment of corporate investment decisions, but also reflects the complexity of the relationship with the market.
In such cases, companies are naturally wary of such collaborations.
In this context, we ask a question:In the current international political and economic environment, how do military enterprises balance the best requirements and market risks?
This question actually involves the strategic choice of military enterprises in the face of the dual pressure of the market and the market.
Military enterprises need to consider not only the strategic needs of the first, but also the market risk and return on investment.
Through effective risk management and strategic planning, military companies can find a balance between the two and achieve sustainable development.
What do you have to say about this?Feel free to leave your thoughts in the comment section!
Note: Original debut, plagiarism must be investigated to the end!
Talk about money every day