The Qing Dynasty's merits were exaggerated, and its violent rule was semblance, and its contribution to the world was insignificant
The Ming Dynasty and the Qing Dynasty cannot be compared, they are by no means on the same level, the Ming Dynasty is the people of the Han Dynasty regime, the people of the Han Dynasty regime, in order to overthrow the Han Dynasty regime, the subjects of the Han Dynasty regime, in order to overthrow the Han Dynasty regime, the people of the Han Dynasty regime, in order to overthrow the Han Dynasty regime, the people of the Han Dynasty regime, in order to overthrow the Han Dynasty regime. The people of the Ming Dynasty, the people of the Han regime, the people of the Han regime, in order to overthrow the Mongol Tatars of the ** and regain power from the Tatars, the people of the Han Dynasty were orthodox. The Qing Dynasty was the regime of the Manchurian Tatars, who ruled the people of the Han Dynasty, and this regime was killed by the Manchus from the Tatars. The foreign Tatar regime was not orthodox.
The rulers of the Ming Dynasty were Han people, who mainly practiced benevolent government, and the Han people lived in peace and contentment for about 300 years (except in the late period). Although there were occasional civil strife and rebellions, they did not affect the overall situation overall, and the Ming Dynasty was still very prosperous. Second, the Qing Dynasty oscillated between ancient and modern history, it was both a feudal dynasty and a modern state**, and it was already in the middle of two different systems. Remember, in the last years of the Qing Dynasty, we were in the second decade of the 20th century, and Chinese society had the telegraph, trains, banks, Gatling gun workshops, hospitals under the modern system, modern factories, and capitalists. Now, we are in a completely different period.
If the Qing dynasty before 1840 was reasonable compared to other earlier dynasties, the second half of the Qing dynasty was very different from the Ming dynasty. Militarily, the Qing Dynasty was likely to win, and China had an obvious reference - Mongolia, because the European superpower Holland was not on the same level as the late Britain, although both were world hegemons, but after all there was a difference of hundreds of years in technology, the technology of the Qing Dynasty had almost no progress in hundreds of years, and in the Ming Dynasty, there was almost no difference between the technology of the Netherlands and China. If the gap is large, it is also a matter of rise and fall. As far as Mongolia is concerned, it was in a completely dominant position in the early and mid-to-late Qing Dynasty, and even became a vassal state of the Qing Dynasty.
Before the Ming Dynasty, in addition to Zhu Di and Lan Yu, the Mongolian forces became a strong threat in both the early and middle and late periods, although Qi Jiguang and Li Chengliang had a large number of cattle breeders, but they were still at a disadvantage for the Mongolian cavalry, one of the big reasons was that the nomads of the Central Plains Dynasty were generally inferior to the Central Plains Dynasty in combat effectiveness, and compared with the Central Plains Dynasty, the mobility and mobilization ability of the nomads could not be compared with the Central Plains Dynasty. Unlike the late Ming Dynasty, where civil and military confluence and the destruction of the national system corrupted, the nomadic system, although primitive, was very practical. The logic of rulers is deeply ingrained in China. Look at King Hu's Litai Conference and Council of Ministers, and then look at the traditions of the Central Plains, which is closer to the separation of powers?The pot in front of you can't be thrown to outsiders, and those who enter the Central Plains can't learn the real Han.
The inherent shortcomings of the foreign dynasties lie in the fact that the assimilation with the Han dynasty and the struggle against the Han dynasty are very protracted, and will even be accompanied by violent political turmoil, which is not conducive to the reconstruction and development of the productive forces. In attacking foreign countries, it is necessary to break with their conservative and backward traditional forces and discard all kinds of evils that are ashamed of being black. Vertically, the Qing Dynasty's national strength and system are definitely better than those of the Ming Dynasty, after all, the times are advancing. The Qing Dynasty can be compared to a high-tech film camera, but digital cameras appeared later. But horizontally, the late Ming period was affected by peasant uprisings and foreign invasions. What did the Qing Dynasty know?When I think of the last years of the Qing Dynasty, I think of a series of unequal treaties that seriously violated national sovereignty.
The Qing Dynasty has always relied on ** to maintain the implementation of the policy of violence against Han compatriots and foreign Tatars, starting from the invasion of Liaodong by the Tatars, to entering the customs, and then to the end of entering the customs. Tens of thousands of popular uprisings and uprisings have always been bloodily suppressed and killed, and even colluded with the government and used foreign weapons and cannons to strangle. **It is also a unique method, which is represented by a thousand cuts, also known as Ling Chi execution. ** Poisoning means are completely useless, there are no ancients before, and there is no one after them. In the face of foreign enemies, the Ming Dynasty has always chosen death rather than submission. No peace, no reparations, no surrender, no tribute, an emperor on the battlefield, a son of heaven who guards the country, and a king who is given death by the gods.
When the Qing Dynasty faced foreign enemies, the emperors either fled with their tails between their legs, or knelt on the ground to beg for mercy and cede land for compensation. The Qing Dynasty relied on sending money, beauties, and land to keep the peace and stabilize the ruling class. In addition, there was no essential difference between the Ming and Qing dynasties;The Qing Dynasty was much larger only in terms of territory and ruled in an equally limited and conservative way, while the Ming Dynasty was dark and oppressive!The social forms of the Ming and Qing dynasties were completely different. After a long-term study of evolution from Qin to Tang, we can see that the Tang, Song and Yuan dynasties were much more open and active, and the most important scientific and technological inventions and astronomical achievements in ancient China occurred in large numbers during the Song and Yuan dynasties, while everything happened in the Ming and Qing dynasties, which became extremely closed and depressing, and lifeless.
In general, then, the virtues and contributions of the Qing Dynasty seem to be greater than those of the Ming Dynasty, but this is only a superficial appearance under the rule of violence, and the real contribution of the two to world history is very small and of little value. The temperament of the Ming Dynasty is good, but it is much worse than our own motherland at this stage, I really don't understand what the Ming fans want to worship, of course, it is okay to like it, the Ming Dynasty will be slightly better than the Qing Dynasty in technology, but it is only a few, compared to the Tang and Song dynasties, of course, let me see whether China's science and technology is the mainstream of the world.