In the current context of globalization, the release of the list of Chinese national civil servants has attracted widespread attention. This list opens up many employment opportunities for international students, especially those pursuing studies at prestigious universities around the world. This policy not only has extremely strict background requirements for international students, but also clarifies the scope of the selected list, which includes the top 100 universities in the rankings, covering the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada and other major study abroad countries. The implementation of this policy provides returnees with more opportunities to participate in the governance and construction of the country.
In the specific list, Beijing, Shanghai and other places have opened the qualification for 2024 directional selection and transfer to international students from the top 100 universities in the rankings. This means that these international students have the opportunity to return to their home countries to participate in the selection process for national civil servants. The list includes 38 well-known universities in the United States, 8 in the United Kingdom, 6 in Australia, and some of them that are considered to be of high quality.
The implementation of this policy is a positive sign for international students who have Xi overseas and have accumulated rich experience. The state fully affirmed their advantages in international vision and professional background, and included them in the reserve force of national civil servants.
Against this backdrop, some people have commented on the level and experience of overseas students. The article mentions the phenomenon of international students being divided into three, six, nine, and so on, forming a chain of contempt. However, facts speak louder than words, and the clear provisions of the policy and the selection criteria of the school prove that this selection is not an opportunity for the general generation. The article also mentions the notion that Australian universities have always been placed at the bottom of the chain of contempt for studying abroad, but in fact, Australian universities are mostly on the list.
This does make some people who are biased against Australian universities feel embarrassed to be slapped in the face. The article defends the negative perception of Australian universities, pointing out that the entry threshold for Australian universities is relatively low, but the graduation threshold is quite high. Through examples, the article mentions the huge academic pressure faced by some international students when studying in Australia, including all-night battles, skipping meals for group discussions, and not even having time to take a shower in order to **.
This reveals the hardships of international students studying at Australian universities, and provides a new perspective for those who have been biased against Australian universities. The article also refutes the views of some people, pointing out that if the level of Australian universities is really not high, the country will have kicked them out of the list of alternative schools a long time ago. This assertion directly counters the distrust of Australian universities, and defends the status of Australian universities through the recognition behind the policies and the clarity of selection criteria.
At the end of the article, he emphasized the positive significance of young people with study abroad background in participating in the reserve force of party and government cadres in the context of globalization. International students with science and engineering backgrounds, after learning Xi advanced technologies in developed countries, may have a better prediction of the development of some cutting-edge industries. This international vision provides new ideas and impetus for the governance and construction of the country.
On the whole, the release of the list of Chinese state civil servants not only provides more employment opportunities for returnees, but also prompts people to re-examine the quality and experience of international students. The implementation of this policy not only shows the country's recognition of international students, but also provides an opportunity for those institutions and international students who have been belittled to rehabilitate. The hardships and international perspectives of international students will inject new strength into the future development of the country.