When reporting China's economic data, the United States** adopted a conversion method that "conforms to the reading Xi habits of local residents". They translated China's data into a form suitable for U.S. readers to improve the readability and accuracy of the news. For example, when reporting on the speed of high-speed trains in China, they would simply write "100 mph", omitting the unit of quantity. Although the unit is not specified, US residents know that this refers to "100 miles per hour". This transformation makes it easier for readers to understand and accept the news content.
However, in contrast, some of the best in China often make some low-level mistakes when reporting economic data, and even mislead readers. They lacked accuracy and professionalism in converting data, and failed to convert according to the reading Xi of local residents. For example, when reporting on the U.S. economic growth rate, China** usually simply writes "Growth 5.."2%”。For China's melon-eating masses, it is easy to understand that "US GDP increased by 5 percent year-on-year."2%”。This simplistic approach is not only inaccurate, but also misleading readers, resulting in distortion and misunderstanding of information. China** should learn to transform data according to the reading Xi of residents in various countries to ensure the accuracy and dissemination of information.
The United States** has shown professionalism and rigor in reporting on China's economic data. They accurately transform the data, follow the reading Xi of local residents, and accurately convey information. When referring to China's economic growth rate, they explicitly add the word "year-on-year" to distinguish it from the annualized month-on-month growth rate. This professional and rigorous approach helps to avoid misunderstandings and distortions, and guarantees the accuracy and credibility of the news.
In contrast, China** has room for further improvement when reporting economic data. We should learn to start from the reader's point of view and transform the data according to their reading Xi. Only in this way can we improve the dissemination effect and readability of news, and avoid misunderstanding and distortion of information. As editors, I believe that we should lead by example, improve our professional ability and news literacy, and strive to deliver accurate and objective information to readers.
By researching and comparing the reports of China and the United States** on China's economic data, I found some interesting phenomena. When converting data, the United States pays attention to conforming to the reading Xi of local residents and accurately conveying information. However, there are still some deficiencies in this regard, and they often simply copy the data and do not convert it according to the reading Xi habits of local residents, resulting in misunderstanding and distortion of information.
As editors, we should learn from this and improve our professionalism and news literacy. Only by accurately conveying information can we win the trust and recognition of readers. At the same time, we should also conduct in-depth research on the reading Xi habits and cultural backgrounds of residents in various countries, and flexibly use different transformation methods to make news closer to the needs of readers.
In the information age, the power of news dissemination is increasing. As editors, we should not only pursue the exclusivity and hotness of the news, but also pay attention to the accuracy and objectivity of the news. Only in this way can we become good editors who are respected and can spread the right information while increasing our impact. Let's work together to do our best!