The ** defeat of Ukraine is already a well-known fact.
Including Ukraine** Zelensky also admitted at the annual press conference that he did not reach the goal.
In addition, Pavel of the Czech Republic, a NATO country, also admitted in an interview that Ukraine's ** has failed.
Pavel served as the chairman of the NATO Military Committee, and also served as the chief of the army general staff in the Czech Republic, and he is very familiar with the military.
However, there are those who speak nonsense with their eyes open and forcibly declare that Russia has lost the war.
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken).
Blinken is rhetorical
In his concluding remarks at the end of the year, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken proudly announced that Putin had lost the war with Ukraine.
The whole world is talking about the defeat of Ukraine, but the top US diplomat has declared that Russia has lost the war, and his face is not ordinarily thick.
Blinken also gave his reasons.
First, Russia has become weaker economically, militarily and diplomatically;
Secondly, NATO has become bigger;
Again, Russia failed to wipe Ukraine off the face of the earth and annex it to Russia.
These reasons, some of which are completely lies, and some of which, although they are facts, do not prove that Russia has lost.
Russia is not getting weaker economically, militarily and diplomatically.
Russia's GDP growth rate this year is even higher than that of many developed Western countries, and Russia's GDP fell by only about 2% last year.
In the military aspect, after two years of baptism in actual combat, the Russian army has achieved a metamorphosis, and its state is at its peak and has not become weaker.
The only thing that is considered a fact is that one more country joined NATO during the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, and NATO's territory has indeed expanded.
Russia-Ukraine conflict).It didn't work to redefine the criteria for victory
The funniest reason Blinken gave was that Russia failed to erase Ukraine.
By this standard, the vast majority of wars in human history have not been won, because not many wars end in the erasure of the other side.
Recently, due to Ukraine's defeat, many voices have been discussing how the West and Ukraine will end, including "redefining the criteria for victory".
Now that the United States has begun to act, as long as Ukraine is not erased, it is Ukraine that wins.
According to Blinken's definition, neither Germany nor Japan was erased during World War II, does it mean that Germany and Japan were the victorious countries in World War II?
This is completely a stealing concept, and the only role it can play is self-comfort, and this kind of self-comfort has no substantive significance, and it is not that the United States will admit defeat to Ukraine if it changes its concept, and who wins and who loses in the end will not depend on how the United States defines the criteria for victory.
Flag of Ukraine and flag of the United States).
The United States is already mentally prepared
It is not the first time that the US side has said this, and the US ** Biden also said the same thing before, directly announcing the defeat of Russia.
The fact that the US has been doing this shows that the United States is psychologically prepared and has even considered how to deal with Ukraine's defeat.
This kind of practice of not having to make a face is not surprising, after all, reversing black and white and pointing a deer as a horse is the basic skill of American politicians.
Now that the United States has given a clear definition, Ukraine is invincible, and as long as Ukraine still exists on the planet, it is Russia that loses.
Judging from the current situation alone, the United States, the West and Ukraine will be immersed in this illusion for a long time to come, which is the only way to cover up the defeat of the West, but no amount of concealment can change the fact of Ukraine's failure.