In the long course of history, the Qin Dynasty is considered to be the first modern state in human history. This idea is not my own innovation, but is derived from the Japanese-American scholar Francis Fukuyama's book The Origins of Political Systems. Fukuyama pointed out that the Qin Dynasty eliminated the nobility and all ** were appointed by the emperor, making it a modern state in human history. In recent years, Fukuyama has gained prominence on the Chinese internet as an advocate for Western democracy.
Comparison of the Qin Dynasty with the modern state.
In the book, Fukuyama asserts that the collapse of the Soviet Union marked the end of history and that Western democracy is the ultimate institution of mankind. However, China's rise has raised questions about this theory, especially those offered by Chinese scholars Zhang Weiwei, Shen Yi, and Chen Pingping. This argument has led to Fukuyama being nicknamed the "Whip Fortune Man" on the Chinese Internet.
Fukuyama's view of the Qin Dynasty as a modern state was by no means intended to praise China, but based on the results of his research. Although this statement may be difficult for Chinese to accept, I think Fukuyama's point is quite reasonable. For the sake of emotion, we can think of the Qin Dynasty as a semi-modern or quasi-modern state, but in fact, deep down, I think of the Qin Dynasty as a modern state.
The advancement of the Qin Dynasty.
The Qin Dynasty established a centralized power, eliminated the aristocracy, and allowed all official positions to be filled by commoners, which made it a representative of a modern state. In addition, the Qin Dynasty also promoted the policy of the same book, the same track, and the same people, implemented a unified currency, weights and measures, and built gallop roads, which provided the basis for nationwide taxation and levy of levies. These initiatives are difficult to achieve in non-modern countries.
Comparison of the Qin Dynasty with the European Powers.
In the historical stage of the rise of the European powers, the advanced nature of the Qin Dynasty cannot be ignored. If the Qin state after the Shang Dynasty reform was placed in Europe, its strength and sophistication would not only not lag behind, but it might even unify the whole of Europe. Small countries like the Netherlands and Luxembourg can survive, let alone Qin
Qin's ability to cope.
One might mention that the European powers had mastered firearms, while the Qin state was still stuck in the age of cold weapons. However, even so, there was room for the Qin state to survive in Europe. What's more, once the Qin State had access to firearms, its people could quickly purchase and manufacture them, thus upgrading the army's equipment in a short period of time.
Differences in the time of technical Xi.
However, the key problem is that the Qin people were able to learn European firearms and other technologies in a short period of time, while European countries could not learn the Qin state's centralized system in a short period of time. The realization of the centralized system required the aristocracy to be willing to withdraw from the stage of history, and this was a long process. As a result, the Qin state may be technologically and institutionally ahead of the European powers in a short period of time.
The institutional basis of the Qin Dynasty.
The centralized system of the Qin State was the foundation of its advanced nature. The advanced nature of this system has made "Qin politics and law practiced for hundreds of generations", which has laid a solid foundation for China's system today. In contrast, the process of developing from primitive African tribes to modern institutions was more difficult. The institutions of the Qin Dynasty were not only easy to develop, but also played a key role in the success of China today.
Conclusion. Although the Qin Dynasty appeared in BC, its system was undoubtedly advanced, at least more advanced than the European powers in the early modern period. The existence of the Qin Dynasty is a testament to the pre-eminence of ancient China in terms of political system and laid a solid foundation for China's rise. Therefore, it makes sense to consider the Qin Dynasty as a modern miracle of ancient China.
The Qin Dynasty: The Modern Enlightenment of History.
The article makes a profound ** on the view that the Qin Dynasty is regarded as a modern state, citing Fukuyama's view as support. By contrasting the institutional and technological differences between the Qin Dynasty and the modern European powers, the article successfully highlights the advanced nature of the Qin Dynasty at that time, and provides readers with a deep understanding of this point of view through a thorough analysis of the historical background.
First of all, the article takes Fukuyama's view as the starting point, positioning the Qin Dynasty as the first modern state in human history. This way of quoting authoritative ideas adds a lot of color to the article and makes the point more convincing. At the same time, by introducing Fukuyama's influence on the Chinese Internet, mentioning that he was nicknamed "Whip Fu Man", it not only adds a sense of humor to the article, but also makes readers have a more intuitive understanding of Fukuyama's influence in China.
Secondly, through the in-depth excavation of the advanced nature of the Qin Dynasty, this paper points out the importance of its policies such as centralization of power and elimination of aristocracy in shaping the modern state. Compared with the modern European powers, the article emphasizes the outstanding performance of the Qin Dynasty in building a unified country and implementing the most centralized power. By enumerating the policies and measures of the Qin Dynasty, the article succeeds in constructing a system of arguments that gives the reader a clearer understanding of the view that the Qin Dynasty is regarded as a modern state.
The article then provides a detailed analysis of the Qin Dynasty's ability to cope in comparison with the European powers. By mentioning the firearms technology of the European powers and the cold weapons of the Qin state, the article cleverly responds to the doubts. The explanation for the time difference in technical Xi is even clearer in expressing the view that the Qin Dynasty may be ahead of Europe in a short time. This in-depth analysis makes the article more logically rigorous and makes the point of view more credible.
Finally, through the analysis of the institutional foundation of the Qin Dynasty, this paper compares it with the system of modern China, which provides a broader vision for the advanced nature of the Qin Dynasty system. Through the quotation of "all generations have practiced Qin politics and law", it successfully expresses the far-reaching influence of the Qin Dynasty in terms of system, which provides strong support for the conclusion of the article.
Overall, this article excels in both the depth and breadth of the arguments. Through clever quotations of authoritative opinions, in-depth analysis of the historical background, and clear logical arguments, the article successfully presents readers with a profound picture of the Qin Dynasty as a modern state, and provides a unique and powerful explanation of the connection between history and modernity.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!