China has a long history and far-reaching influence, and the history of 5,000 years is not just a story. Since the birth of mankind, it has experienced a primitive society, a slave society, and evolved into a feudal society that lasted for more than 2,000 years.
In addition to classic literary works, we can also find many precious works of art. More people may be willing to explore the excellence of the ancient sages in artistic production than the monotonous text. It's not only fun, but it's also a great way to get a full picture of that fascinating history.
When the ancients minted works of art, they did not do it just for decorative purposes. There may be a necessity, a personal desire, or an over-belief in the superstitious beliefs of the time that certain crafts can be made to ensure good health.
The scale of handicrafts is large and small, from jadeite, pearls, earrings, necklaces, to palaces and even cities. Many ancient artworks have undergone historical scrubbing and become precious cultural relics today, which are constantly being excavated and studied by experts, but also causing many questions and controversies.
For example, the terracotta warriors and horses of the Mausoleum of Qin Shi Huang in Xi'an shocked the world, but when these terracotta warriors and horses were unearthed, they caused many doubts. Did Qin Shi Huang really burn the terracotta warriors and horses with living people?After a terracotta warrior in Xi'an cracked, the truth finally surfaced.
The reason for the suspicion was mainly the thinking of the people at that time. In the Qin Dynasty's view, death was not the end, but a transition from one world to another. Therefore, they believe that the deceased will still hold the same duties in the other world. According to this belief, a large number of court ladies were buried after Qin Shi Huang's death, and even the craftsmen who built the tomb were locked inside to ensure that Qin Shi Huang was served in the other world. In this context, many people believe that as the emperor's concubines, most of them were dragged to the burial, and the army was more obliged to expand the territory with the emperor in another world, so it was suspected that living people were used.
Of course, if the living person is directly used for burial, the goal of dominating the other world cannot be achieved because the corpse will decompose quickly. Therefore, it is believed that the purpose of burning a living person is to prevent damage. However, this view is mainly based on the political system of the Qin dynasty.
The Qin Dynasty ruled brutally, and the high regard for the law even became one of the main reasons for its demise. Qin Shi Huang rejected the Confucian idea of governing the country and adopted the ideas of Legalism. However, in terms of implementation, his methods appeared to be extreme, including the burning of books and the imposition of harsh punishments. This draconian law was originally intended to deter lawbreakers, but in the Qin dynasty it was universally applied to everyone. This system does not seem to be much different from the use of living people to make terracotta warriors.
Judging from the production process of the terracotta warriors, the shape of its face and legs is basically the same as that of modern people. According to experts, the terracotta warriors and horses originally had colors, and they were almost indistinguishable from living people after being completely restored. Therefore, since the terracotta warriors and horses of the Mausoleum of Qin Shi Huang were unearthed, there has been a lot of controversy, mainly focusing on whether to use living people for production.
However, with the unearthing of a broken terracotta statue, the idea of insisting on the use of living people was quickly refuted. The terracotta warrior lost its head due to damage underground, and it was proved that there was no human tissue in it.
Subsequently, with the excavation of more damaged terracotta warriors and horses, the claim of using living people was further denied. Although there was controversy at that time, this also invisibly proved the greatness and excellent technology of the ancient working people of our country, and its production level even reached the point of being fake. To a certain extent, this controversy has promoted the process of research in China.
In general, although the production of the Terracotta Warriors and Horses of the Mausoleum of Qin Shi Huang has gone through controversy, in the process of scientific inspection, we have a more comprehensive understanding of China's ancient labor skills and cultural heritage. These precious cultural relics bear witness to the unique style of a great historical era, and also provide profound historical lessons for future generations.
This article delves into a controversial topic in Chinese history – the production of the Terracotta Warriors and Horses of the Mausoleum of Qin Shi Huang. The article first reviews the long and rich history of China, emphasizing that the history of the upper and lower 5,000 years is not only a story, but also the profound heritage of Chinese culture. When introducing the production of ancient artworks, the article pointed out that these handicrafts are not just decorations, but may contain the values, beliefs and expectations of the society at that time.
By introducing the production process of the Terracotta Warriors and Horses of the Mausoleum of Qin Shi Huang, the article arouses the reader's interest in the high level of craftsmanship of ancient civilizations. Through the analysis of the production process and historical background, the author introduces the reader to a world that is both mysterious and thought-provoking. By describing the funeral system and the concept of society at that time, the article vividly shows the unique understanding of life and death and the afterlife of the people of that time. This gives the reader a deeper understanding of the way of thinking and cultural beliefs of the time.
In the second half of the article, the author discusses the political system and brutal rule of the Qin dynasty, as well as the excessive emphasis on the law. Through this part of the narrative, the reader can feel the harshness of the society and the extremes of the rule of law at that time. Linking this political system to the terracotta warriors-making process, the author demonstrates a deep understanding of the unique historical context of the Qin Shi Huang era. While the article is a historical event, it also reveals the interweaving of history and human nature.
The controversy is not only due to the historical events themselves, but also to the influence of the social concepts and political systems of the time. By analyzing the reasons for suspecting that Qin Shi Huang burned terracotta warriors and horses with living people, the author shows the influence of social concepts on the interpretation of historical events at that time. This profound historical reading provides readers with a multi-layered understanding of ancient Chinese society.
Finally, the article shows that the controversy over the use of living people to make terracotta warriors and horses has been resolved in modern times through a process of scientific examination. This scientific method provides new avenues for historical research, allows us to understand the past more objectively, and emphasizes the need for in-depth study of historical events.
Overall, this article provides an in-depth understanding of the social, cultural, and political system of ancient China through a multi-angle analysis while delving into the production process of the Terracotta Warriors and Horses of the Mausoleum of Qin Shi Huang. Through the use of scientific methods, the article calls on readers to look at history from an objective perspective, while also providing a new perspective on the greatness and complexity of ancient Chinese civilization.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!