Recently, there has been a very interesting "business war" on the Internet, and the main form of this "business war" can be said to be a small report to the teacher. Tencent's new game "Yuanmeng Star", which has just started public beta for a long time, has been smeared by a large number of "essays" on the Internet. If these "essays" are really high-level and reasonable, it will be fine. But the problem is that these "compositions" focus on a large quantity, and in terms of "quality", it is really flattering. It belongs to the main play of a large amount, in order to make players reject "Yuan Dream Star".
There are many black spots in these "essays" that seem to be reasonable, but in fact there is no truth at all. The most obvious of these "compositions" is that "Yuan Dream Star" only has the linkage authorization of "Fall Guys: Ultimate Elimination", and there is no genuine authorization. According to their meaning, linkage is linkage, and authorization is authorization. There seems to be some truth to that.
But in fact, if you think about it carefully, you will find that if the linkage authorization and the genuine authorization are to be implemented in two steps, it is completely a fart to take off your pants. It's like inviting someone to dinner, and then after eating, they say I just invited you to dinner, and didn't say I paid for it. This kind of talk is purely a play on words, and these "compositions" are frantically attacked with this as a black spot.
As for whether "Fall Guys: Ultimate Elimination" is authorized or not, another interesting point is that these essays almost unanimously said that "Yuan Dream Star" plagiarized "Fall Guys: Ultimate Elimination", "Beast Party", "Egg Boy Party" and many other games. Then the question arises, why don't these "essays" accuse "Metadream Star" of not being licensed for other games, but only "Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout"?
The reason for this is also very simple, that is, as a game of the paradise party, "Beast Party" was first launched, some people said that it was a plagiarism of "Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout", and as a mobile game, "Egg Boy Party" was even more said that it was a copy of "Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout" and "Beast Party".
In other words, in fact, everyone knows that if you really want to talk about plagiarism in the gameplay, then almost all the latecomers are plagiarizing "Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout", so the authorization of other latecomers has no gold content at all compared with the authorization of "Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout".
Not to mention that the same gameplay is not plagiarism in the first place, according to the plagiarism standards of the "sunspots", then "Egg Boy Party" is also a "big copy" for games such as "Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout" and "Beast Party", which is completely a "head offender" that has set a precedent for plagiarism. But these "essays" don't talk about "Egg Boy Party" without any authorization, and only talk about the latecomer "Yuan Dream Star", do you think this is a little obvious?