Recently, a property company replacement in Jinghaiyuan Community, Qianwei Street, Xishan District, Kunming has caused collective opposition from the owners. It is understood that Jinghaiyuan Community is a relatively large-scale relocation community, with nearly 700 households. In August this year, after the five-year old property contract for managing the community expired, Xinghai Community rehired a company called Longteng Property, which sparked dissatisfaction among the owners.
Some owners said they did not agree with the entry of the new property company. They are worried that the new property company will increase prices and renovate indiscriminately, and pass on the cost to the owners. To add insult to the outrage, the owners said they had not been consulted in the process of deciding to change strata companies, nor had they been informed of the specifics of the contract. It is reported that 622 of the owners did not agree with the change of property management company.
However, the person in charge of the Xinghai community said that the employment of the new property company was open for selection in accordance with the relevant regulations, and the procedures were compliant and legal, and there was no deliberate concealment. The person in charge stressed that if the owners find that the services of the new property company are not in place or are unreasonable, they can report it to the community, and the community will urge them to rectify it. In addition, once the owners have received the title deeds and formed the owners' committee, the employment rights of the strata company will be transferred to the owners' committee.
This incident has attracted widespread attention and discussion on the Internet. Many netizens have expressed their support for the owner's ** action, believing that the owner's opinion should be respected and their opinion should be sought. They are concerned that a similar situation may occur in other communities and call for tighter supervision of property company hiring. However, there are also some netizens who are skeptical of the owners' opposition actions, believing that the decisions of ** and the community should be respected, and the owners should give the new property company a chance to prove their capabilities.
In fact, similar property company changes are not uncommon. In many cities, especially in some large-scale resettlement communities, owners are dissatisfied with the choice and service of property management companies. Some property companies have problems such as chaotic management, inadequate services, and opaque fees, which have triggered collective opposition from property owners. How to solve this problem, improve the service quality of property companies and the satisfaction of owners has become an urgent problem to be solved.
The impact of this incident on society cannot be ignored either. First of all, it has aroused the attention of all sectors of society to property management issues and increased the pressure on the supervision of property companies. At the same time, it reminds property owners that their rights need to be protected, and encourages them to actively participate in the management and decision-making of community affairs.
At present, there is no latest progress in the dispute between the owners of Jinghaiyuan Community and Xinghai Community. But it is foreseeable that this incident will have a profound impact on the property management of the entire community. Whether it is to continue to be the responsibility of the new property management company or to re-hire the old property management company, it is necessary to fully communicate and negotiate with the owner to reach a consensus and safeguard the interests of the owner.
For the impact of the whole event, it needs to be carried out objectively. First of all, it reminds the property company to pay attention to the opinions and needs of the owners and follow the principle of openness and transparency. Secondly, it encourages owners to pay more attention to and participate in the management of community affairs, and improves their awareness of the protection of their rights and interests. Finally, it also prompts the whole society to think deeply about and improve the problem of property management.
Finally, I would like to raise a question, how do you think there should be effective communication and consultation between the community and the owners in a similar issue?In the meantime, what are your thoughts and suggestions on this incident?Welcome to leave a message to discuss.