With the implementation of the "double reduction" policy, the gap between private and public schools is significant, and the clues can be seen in the near future
The double reduction policy to relieve students' Xi pressure and learning pressure was officially launched, which made the make-up institutions in a difficult situation, and the degree of education involution has also been slowed down to a certain extent.
In the context of exam-oriented education, judging heroes by scores has become the norm for many families and even schools. Students also have to make up Xi after completing the school curriculum, which not only increases the pressure Xi school, but also brings psychological problems to some students. In order to enable young people to grow up more healthily, the relevant departments of education have been advocating to reduce the burden on students.
By eliminating evening Xi and reducing homework, students were able to free themselves from the heavy work of Xi life. However, some parents are worried that this situation may lead to a decline in students' academic Xi grades, so make-up classes have become the first choice for many parents, thus creating an embarrassing situation where the education department reduces the burden and parents increase the pressure.
With the implementation of the double reduction policy, education has returned to the school itself. The large number of after-school Xi classes has led to an unhealthy educational model. However, when the student's academic Xi and performance cannot keep up, parents will have a lot of make-up classes on the student's weekends and holidays, and the student feels that he needs to make up the class anyway, so he may relax his learning Xi during school classes and form thinking inertia.
This situation creates a "vicious circle", where the focus of education shifts from schools to remedial classes. The implementation of the double reduction policy has caused the make-up classes to fall into a cold period, and the focus of education has returned to the school itself. If you want to improve your academic Xi, you need students to take the class seriously and think well after class.
Many years ago, remedial classes were not as common as they are now, and students relied mainly on self-awareness to improve their grades. The implementation of the double reduction policy has made the education model return to education itself, and I believe that students' grades will not decline. Even if there is no external supplement, there is still the possibility of being a top student, which mainly depends on the school's education model and the student's Xi attitude.
With the implementation of the double reduction policy, make-up classes are no longer allowed in the compulsory education stage, resulting in a dilemma for make-up classes, and the educational gap between private schools and public schools has gradually emerged, and students' academic Xi performance has been different.
Double minus"The implementation of the policy has widened the educational gap between private and public schools, a trend that has recently become apparent.
There are obvious differences between private and public schools in terms of education models. Private schools pay more attention to the promotion rate, so their education models have been adjusted accordingly. Many private schools have a dormitory system and implement strict time management, stipulating when students get up to wash up and when to read in the morning. In this model, known as "military management", a rigorous academic Xi atmosphere and a rigorous educational approach help improve students' academic performance. Public schools, on the other hand, follow the policies of the Ministry of Education.
Under the double reduction policy, schools have reduced the assignment of homework. Since most private schools adopt a day school system, students are no longer supervised by teachers and schools after school, and the Xi of learning is completely dependent on the students' consciousness. As a result, the efficiency of Xi may not be as high as that of students in private schools.
The main goal of private schools is to increase the admission rate, and a high admission rate can help attract more students to sign up and increase the visibility of the school. Therefore, private schools tend to hire teachers with rich qualifications and higher academic qualifications to teach students faster and better. This is also the difference between private schools and public schools in terms of teachers.
Under the implementation of the double reduction policy, public schools as a whole may be more relaxed in terms of campus learning Xi atmosphere. In contrast, in order to increase the admission rate, the Xi atmosphere in private schools may still be relatively tight. In this case, the gap between students gradually becomes apparent.
Although the burden reduction policy aims to reduce the pressure on students to Xi school, it does not mean that Xi will be easier. Students still need to consciously learn and Xi, improve their self-management skills, and think more and use their brains. In the process of learning Xi, it is necessary to put an end to procrastination and solve the problems that arise on the day in a timely manner.
In general, the introduction of the double reduction policy aims to reduce the pressure of students' academic Xi, attach importance to the cultivation of all-round quality, and reduce the excessive educational concept of judging heroes by scores. However, in order to achieve the goal of reducing the burden, the education models of public and private schools should converge and avoid the situation of either party "leading" excessively, so as to ensure the balanced distribution of educational resources and promote educational equity. It is believed that with the full implementation of the double reduction policy, China's education industry will usher in continuous progress.
Today's topic: Under the double reduction policy, do you think private schools will have more advantages?