The new Israeli-Palestinian conflict has lasted more than 70 days since it began on 7 October. The conflict has led to a bitter confrontation between the two sides, which has aroused international concern. Israel** was forced to return to the negotiating table in the face of multiple international and domestic pressures. The core issues of the conflict, including the exchange of detainees and the ceasefire, have been the focus of negotiations between the two sides.
Israel, the United States and Qatar** reportedly held consultations in Warsaw, the capital of Poland, to resolve the issue of personnel exchange and ceasefire. At the same time, Hamas leaders traveled to Cairo, the capital of Egypt, to negotiate a ceasefire with the Egyptian side. This series of diplomatic efforts shows that all parties are seeking a negotiated solution to the dispute.
Israel** is facing multiple internal and external pressures. In China, calls for the rescue of detainees are rising, and the families of detainees hold large-scale demonstrations to express their dissatisfaction with **. Internationally, the United States has demanded that Israel reduce the intensity of its military operations, and the international community has urged a ceasefire. As a result, Israel has to consider balancing various interests and pressures at home and abroad in its negotiations.
While all parties have shown a willingness to negotiate a negotiated solution to the conflict, the prospects for a ceasefire negotiation are fraught with uncertainty. Analysts have pointed out that there is a big gap between Israel and Hamas on the issue of a ceasefire, including the duration of the ceasefire and the conditions for the release of detainees. This makes negotiations complicated and difficult.
Israel** has previously declared that the goal of the military operation is to eliminate Hamas and free the detainees. However, the analysis believes that it will be difficult to achieve this goal through ground warfare alone. The uncertainty of military action and elusive goals have also led Israel** to reconsider the search for a negotiated solution.
As an ally of Israel, the attitude of the United States has also undergone a subtle change. Although it has been providing support, in the face of the increase in the number of people in the Gaza Strip**, the United States** has gradually taken a tougher stance, demanding that Israel reduce the intensity of its military operations. This change may affect Israel's actions in the conflict to some extent.
If the Israeli army is unable to achieve the set goals or accepts higher conditions for the exchange of prisoners in the negotiations, it may cause dissatisfaction among the right-wing forces in the country and lead to internal turmoil. Eventually, this could lead to the collapse of **, triggering a new round of elections. This political uncertainty adds more controversy and risk to the conflict.
Ceasefire negotiations for a new round of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are fraught with uncertainty. Multiple pressures at home and abroad make it difficult to reach agreement in negotiations, and the dilemma of military operations adds to the complexity of solutions. With political discontent and election risks mounting, the future remains contentious.