In the recent conflict in the Middle East, the siege of the Gaza Strip by the Israeli army has aroused widespread concern in the international community. Israel's actions are aimed at weakening Hamas, but they have also led to a large number of civilians** and humanitarian crises. The United States, as Israel's main ally, initially supported Israel's military operations, but as the conflict escalated and international pressure mounted, the United States** began to call for a ceasefire. The position of Western countries in this conflict has also been criticized, accused of double standards and hypocrisy. Moreover, there is an argument that China may benefit from the conflict, but this argument ignores the far-reaching implications of the conflict for all parties involved.
Israel's military operations have made some progress in the Gaza Strip, but Hamas has not given up resistance. They used a network of tunnels to fight back, firing rockets at Israeli cities. The Israeli army's advance on the outskirts of the city may be a deliberate concession by Hamas in order to deplete Israel's living forces in urban street fighting. The Israeli army has shown caution in the operation, avoiding direct entry into Gaza City, and instead resorting to a strategy of partition and encirclement.
Israel may try to deplete Hamas's resources, especially the fuel needed for tunnels, by ***. This tactic aims to reduce harm to civilians and induce civilians to evacuate northern Gaza. However, the effectiveness of this strategy remains questionable, as Hamas's tunnel network is complex and difficult to fully control.
The attitude of the United States towards Israel has changed, and US Secretary of State Antony Blinken has urged Israel to reduce the harm it does to civilians and to have a partial ceasefire. The United States has even hinted at the possibility of reducing military aid to Israel in order to induce Israel to accept a ceasefire. This suggests that the United States, under international pressure, is beginning to reconsider its support for Israel.
The position of Western countries in this conflict has also been criticized, accused of double standards and hypocrisy. The West's unconditional support for Israel, in stark contrast to its position in other conflicts, undermines the moral standing of the West. This shift in stance could affect the course of other international conflicts, including the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
The argument that China may be the biggest winner of this conflict ignores the far-reaching implications of the conflict for all parties involved. Conflict resolution requires the joint efforts of the international community, rather than simply treating one country as a winner or loser.
Overall, the conflict between Israel and Hamas is a complex international issue that involves many political, military and humanitarian factors. Resolving this conflict requires the joint efforts of the international community to achieve lasting peace and stability in the region.