The Three Kingdoms Conspiracy Revealed: Why did Cao Cao accept Guan Yu and abandon Zhuge Liang?The truth of history is amazingly revealed!
In the long history of the Three Kingdoms, Cao Cao was known as the master of treachery, but why did he woo Guan Yu in every possible way while he was eager to seek talent, but he let go of Zhuge Liang?We delve into it, reveal the historical truth, and solve this mystery.
Cao Cao was thirsty for talent all his life, and when he started the army in the early days, he accepted heroes such as Li Dian and Le Jin, and was assisted by Xun, Guo, Liu Ye, Cheng Yu and other talents. However, why did Guan Yu try everything to woo him, but did not include the talented Zhuge Liang in the account?
Guan Yu is brave and good at fighting, his face is loyal, and he is deeply favored by Cao Cao. Cao Cao even feasted after the Battle of Xuzhou, and was extremely gracious and let him go north. But Liu Bei's right-hand man, Mr. Wolong, Zhuge Liang's role is more significant, so why didn't Cao Cao go to Wollongong to find talents?
First of all, Zhuge Liang was bent on revitalizing the Han Dynasty, and Cao Cao was really a Han thief. Although Cao Cao was powerful, he deviated from the orthodoxy of the Han Dynasty and was labeled as a "Han thief", while Zhuge Liang's ambition was to rejuvenate the Han Dynasty, so he chose Liu Bei.
Secondly, Zhuge Liang is talented and unknown. Although it is called "Wolong", Liu Bei has defected to Liu Biao for many years and does not know anything about it. Cao Cao's subordinates were even more ignorant of Zhuge Liang's talent and lacked attention.
Finally, the geographical division caused Zhuge Liang's resources to be in Jingzhou. Cao Cao's forces were mainly in the north, and he lacked understanding of Zhuge Liang of the Jingzhou faction, and because of timing and geographical reasons, he did not have the opportunity to find other princes' figures.
Comprehensive analysis shows that Cao Cao's acceptance of Guan Yu and the sparing of Zhuge Liang are due to the combined influence of many factors such as political line, mass foundation, and regional reasons. This historical decision allows us to have a deeper understanding of the relationship between the characters in the Three Kingdoms period and uncover this historical mystery.
This article analyzes in detail the reasons why Cao Cao accepted Guan Yu and let Zhuge Liang go during the Three Kingdoms period, and provides an in-depth analysis of this historical issue. First of all, the article introduces the background of Cao Cao's thirst for talents, points out Cao Cao's early successful experience in recruiting troops and horses, and absorbs talents, emphasizing Cao Cao's open-minded attitude in employing people, and can use all kinds of heroes and generals to make an exception, forming the strength to unify northern China. This paved the way for the later article to explain why Cao Cao chose Guan Yu instead of Zhuge Liang.
The article then focuses on the analysis of Cao Cao's favor for Guan Yu, and describes Guan Yu's heroism and loyalty. Through the description of Cao Cao's generous treatment and banquet of Guan Yu, Cao Cao's affection for Guan Yu is emphasized. The description of this part makes it easier for readers to understand Cao Cao's unique feelings for Guan Yu, and provides a foreshadowing for the follow-up on why Cao Cao did not choose Zhuge Liang.
Then, the article provides an in-depth analysis of Zhuge Liang's role and emphasizes his significant contribution to Liu Bei's career. Through the description of Zhuge Liang helping Liu Bei achieve important battle victories, his resourcefulness and talent are emphasized. The description of this section highlights Zhuge Liang's political and military prowess, and provides an explanation for why Cao Cao did not choose him.
Then, the article analyzes the three reasons why Cao Cao did not choose Zhuge Liang one by one: the single-minded Han family, the talented and unknown, and the geographical division. This analysis not only interprets the personal aspirations of historical figures, but also deeply analyzes the historical background of the time from the perspective of regional and political beliefs, presenting readers with a more three-dimensional and multi-angle historical picture.
Finally, the article cleverly uses words such as "decryption" and "reveal", which adds a layer of mystery to the whole article, making readers more expectant and eye-catching. On the whole, this review** fully demonstrates the deep thinking and understanding of the content of the original text, and provides readers with an in-depth interpretation of the history of the Three Kingdoms through meticulous analysis.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!