How to put it, the United States seems to be entering a "meal time". As we all know, the United States recently went so far as to announce that it would spend $2.5 billion in military aid to Ukraine, claiming that it would be the last aid this year. Smart people can see at a glance that this is a message from the United States to its Western allies.
What is even more surprising is that the EU and Ukraine have simultaneously launched the "Plan B" to deal with the Russia-Ukraine conflict, which shows that the current war situation is very urgent and forces all parties to take action.
First of all, the EU, we all understand that Ukraine is striving for membership, but within the EU there is no agreement on the funding of aid to Ukraine. Despite the fact that Ukraine is in dire need of money and equipment, it is in an unsolvable dilemma within the European Union.
This poses a serious problem, and if this delay continues, aid to Ukraine could reach an impasse. After all, how can the United States stop after dropping the last military aid?This will directly embarrass the United States, will the EU dare to take the liberty of snubbing the United States?
Therefore, the EU quickly launched the "Plan B", the biggest advantage of which is that it only requires the consent of several highest-rated member states to pass an aid package for Ukraine.
It seems to me that the EU is clearly under some kind of instruction or pressure, otherwise why would the EU members be so eager to provide economic support to Ukraine after they had been dragging their feet on the issue of aid to Ukraine at the beginning?
Actually, I don't need to say too much, and everyone knows where the pressure comes from. But one of the interesting things has to be admitted is that in order to adopt a package of assistance to Ukraine, the EU clearly bypassed its so-called regulations. This makes one wonder if the content of cooperation with China in the future will also be manipulated in this wayIt seems that the EU is also learning from the United States, and China needs to be vigilant.
Going back to Ukraine, it is interesting that the Ukrainian side is clearly in a difficult situation in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, not only unable to launch an offensive, but even holding positions has become a problem.
Recently, Ukraine once again rumored that it intends to conscript another 500,000 soldiers, and even lower the conscription age. There is clearly a determination to "fight to the last man". However, at this juncture, former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko stood out against it, pointing out that this will not solve the problem, and Ukraine also needs a "plan B" to ensure victory.
In her proposal, the Ukrainian police became a "quality source" that could be sent to the battlefield. However, if all police officers are sent to the front line, what will be the situation for security in Ukraine?Obviously, some of this kind of rhetoric only sees the present and ignores the long-term, and there is a feeling of ignoring the head and the tail. Such an irresponsible statement also makes people wonder if Zelensky is already unbearable, and whether Ukraine needs to find another person to take the lead?
I have to admit that this series of operations is really confusing. I think that Russia will definitely find it a little funny in its heart when it sees all this. The United States is now not only unable to control the situation in Ukraine, but is also trying to suck nutrients from this last bit of "blood" of the European Union. Hasn't the EU become a much bigger version of Ukraine?
Russia is not in a hurry to negotiate at the moment, after all, watching the United States and Europe entanglement for a little military aid makes people feel bitter. But who calls the United States and the West asking for trouble?
List of high-quality authors