Two days ago, in the article "The Four Major Plagiarism Incidents in the Poetry World in 2023, Which One Is the Most Destructive?".", a vote was set up to select the most destructive plagiarism incident in the poetry world from the four major plagiarism incidents of Feng Mouhui, Wang Moumin, Wu Mouxuan and "Contemporary Poetry", and the voting results came out.
A total of five options were set up in this vote, namely "Not big", "Feng Mouhui's plagiarism incident", "Wang Moumin's plagiarism incident", "Wu Mouxuan's plagiarism incident" and "Contemporary Poetry" incident. There is no option to set "all large", just to hope that it will be more superior.
A total of 282 friends voted, thank you very much!Among them, "not big" 19 votes, accounting for 674%, "Feng Mouhui's plagiarism incident" 13 votes, accounting for 461%, "Wang Moumin's plagiarism incident" 5 votes, accounting for 177%, "Wu Mouxuan's plagiarism incident" 126 votes, accounting for 4468, "Contemporary Poetry Incident" 119 votes, accounting for 4220%。
The results of this poll show that most people feel that Wu Mouxuan's plagiarism incident is the most destructive. Of course, the "Contemporary Poetry" incident also received a very high number of votes. I think that the "Contemporary Poetry" incident is the most destructive, because such a plagiarism incident really shouldn't have happened.
The Contemporary Poetry incident makes one wonder if the editors have actually read the work. If you really read the work, you should not know Niu Han's "South China Tiger". Moreover, the previous issue of "Contemporary Poetry" had just published Niu Han's "South China Tiger", and this issue was followed by the publication of works that plagiarized the work.
This is indeed extremely destructive to the poetry world, and the poetry editors who should be strictly controlled have become decorations, which is unjustifiable no matter how you say it. On December 29, 2023, "Contemporary Poetry" published an article "Contemporary Poetry" to poets and readers, which seemed to respond to the incident, but it seemed that there was no response.
But as a result of the vote, most people chose Wu Mouxuan's plagiarism incident to be the most destructive. Wu Mouxuan's high-profile "plagiarism is reasonable" remarks really surprised people. But this is a personal act after all, and it is not much different from the plagiarism incident of Feng Mouhui and Wang Moumin.
The main reason why most friends choose Wu Mouxuan's plagiarism incident is that Wu Mouxuan's remarks have not been dealt with accordingly. The silence of the poetry world and its related departments makes people lose sight of the determination of zero tolerance for plagiarism. This is probably the reason why many people are chilled by the poetry world, if plagiarism is tacitly allowed, then what do you want to be original?
The results of this poll also show that people are deeply disgusted by plagiarism in the poetry world. Plagiarized works can be published in major publications in a grand manner, which is indeed a "very insulting" behavior for the poetry world. The damage to the original creator is irreparable.
And the poetry world turns a blind eye to the plagiarism incident, which is even more chilling. So far, there are still many *** poets, even the famous ones (I won't name them here, but everyone should not forget them), and they are still like fish in water in the poetry world. Their works can be published and even awarded, and they still occupy an important position in the poetry world, unscathed.
Therefore, it is understandable why most people choose Wu Mouxuan's plagiarism incident, which is the most destructive to the poetry world. This also shows from the side that plagiarism in the poetry world is indeed extremely harmful, and the poetry world should be vigilant. It's not the kind of shouting slogans to show determination, but really putting it into action. Fooling around is not passable, but it makes people more chilling.