Tear each other apart!Lao Liang angrily reprimanded Dao Lang Rakshasa Haishi is not, let alone the p

Mondo Entertainment Updated on 2024-01-30

Recently, the famous ** critic Lao Liang expressed his views on Daolang's new song "Rakshasa Sea City" in an interview. Lao Liang bluntly said that "Rakshasa Haishi" cannot be regarded as an original, let alone reach the peak level of China's **. Lao Liang believes that Daolang's new song lacks uniqueness in melody, lyrics and style, which he calls "a copy of **", and does not bring new feelings and experiences to the audience. Lao Liang accused Daolang of not showing real innovation and breakthroughs, but just repeating the ** patterns and themes of the past. He believes that "Rakshasa Haishi" lacks the charm and level it should have in the rich and diverse Chinese culture.

Lao Liang's remarks quickly aroused heated discussions among the majority of netizens. Some people agreed with Lao Liang's view, believing that Daolang's new song really lacks the spirit of innovation and the pursuit of excellence. They pointed out that China has a long history and rich and diverse cultural heritage, and there should be more original and in-depth works. However, there are also people who disagree with Lao Liang's view. They believe that ** is a form of artistic expression, and everyone's aesthetic views are different. Daolang's songs may not break through the tradition, but they have touched the hearts of many people. They believe that the value of the best lies not only in innovation, but also in whether it can convey emotions and touch people's hearts. This controversy has sparked thinking about the direction of China's **.

There are some similarities between this incident and similar controversies in the field. In the past few years, there have been many ** works that have caused controversy on the web because of their lack of innovation or accusations of being "copies". For example, in 2013, singer Ahsan's song "Wings of **" was accused of plagiarism because of the similarity of melody and lyrics. This incident has aroused discussion among netizens, on the one hand, some people think that this is a manifestation of the lack of originality of creation, and on the other hand, some people think that ** is an art form that can be borrowed and quoted from each other.

This controversy has sparked reflections and discussions on China's creation. On the one hand, some netizens believe that artists should be encouraged to innovate, pursue excellence, and inject new vitality and creativity into China. They want to see more original and high-level works appear. On the other hand, there are also some netizens who believe that the value of ** lies not only in innovation, but also in conveying emotions and touching people's hearts. They believe that whether it is traditional or modern, the best creation should uphold sincerity and uniqueness, create with heart, and appreciate with heart.

At present, there are no new reports and developments on Daolang's new song "Rakshasa Sea City" and Lao Liang's comments.

This controversy is a reminder of people's tastes and demands. It is an art that touches people's hearts and inspires emotions. Whether it is traditional or modern, we should uphold sincerity and uniqueness, create with heart, and appreciate with heart. We should cherish the treasures of tradition and continue to excavate and pass it on. At the same time, artists should also be encouraged to be brave in innovation, bold experiments, and inject new vitality and creativity into China. Only when everyone can give full play to their talents and creativity, can China move towards a more brilliant future.

What do you think of Lao Liang's opinion and Daolang's new song "Rakshasa Sea City"?Do you think that creation should focus on innovation or emotional expression?Welcome to leave a message to participate in the discussion.

Related Pages