According to reports, the self-management committee of the School of Economics and Management of Jiangsu Suqian University decided to use law enforcement recorders during dormitory inspections from February 5. The decision sparked a backlash from students who felt that such an act violated their privacy and personal space. Despite the reasons given by the college for supporting the decision, the students were unhappy and asked the college to revoke the rule. So, is it absurd for a body camera to enter the dormitory?This article will explore this issue.
The College's support for the use of law enforcement cameras by the Self-Management Council is mainly based on two considerations. First of all, they said that doing so would solve the problem of student financial custody. In past inspections, there have been cases of student leaders losing their belongings after entering unattended dormitories. This has had a negative impact on the student leaders, making them suspicious of their actions. Through the use of law enforcement recorders, the inspection process can be supervised and documented to dispel suspicion of student cadres.
Secondly, the college believes that the use of law enforcement recorders can ensure that the self-management committee's handling and punishment of students can be implemented. Body cameras can provide audio and ** recordings of the inspection process, which can be used as evidence for sentencing. The college believes that such an approach can convince students and reduce dissatisfaction and controversy over the results.
However, these reasons do not fully convince students to accept this provision. Students believe that the college can solve the problem of financial custody and the handling and discipline of students through other, more scientific and effective methods, instead of relying on law enforcement cameras. They believe that protecting the privacy of individuals is more important than solving these problems.
Students have expressed strong opposition to the entry of body cameras into the dormitories. They believe that this is an invasion of their privacy and personal space, and a lack of respect on the part of the Academy. Dormitories are students' private areas, where they can relax and deserve full protection. Students pointed out that there are surveillance cameras everywhere in the school, and that the dormitory should be a relatively private place and should not be equipped with surveillance equipment. They fear that their privacy will be compromised, and they are skeptical that such rules can be enforced.
The students also said that even if the data content of the body camera is not viewed, there is still a risk of privacy leakage. In the absence of absolute security, preventing a body camera from entering the dormitory would be a better option. They believe that without privacy, the dormitory is no longer a place of peace of mind.
In addition, students felt that the college's explanation did not dispel their concerns about privacy violations. Students firmly believe that protecting personal privacy is the primary responsibility of the school, not wantonly trampling on and sabotage. They believe that schools should protect their personhood and dignity and not solve problems by invading privacy.
In the face of strong opposition from students, the college said that it was soliciting students' opinions and would not enforce the rule if it was too controversial. The students are looking forward to this and hope that the college will listen to them and reverse the decision.
Students want the college to be more respectful of their rights and interests and to fully protect their privacy and personal space. They hope that the college can solve the problem through other more reasonable and effective methods, and fully communicate and negotiate with students. They hope that the college can establish a more fair and transparent system, so that students can study and live with peace of mind Xi
As a student editor, I am critical of the college's decisions. I believe that students' privacy and personal space should be fully respected and protected. Although there are a number of reasons put forward by the college for the use of body cameras, I don't think these reasons are fully convincing students to accept this rule.
As the governing body of students, the college should give priority to the rights and interests of students and respect their personality and dignity. The college should solve the problem through other more reasonable and effective methods, and fully communicate and negotiate with the students. Only by establishing a fair and transparent system can students truly feel at ease in their studies, Xi and life.
Finally, I would like to call on the College to listen to the voices of students, revoke this rule, and work with students to create a more harmonious and respectful environment for the school. Let's work together to fight to protect the privacy and dignity of our students.