Recently, Yi Zhongtian made fierce remarks in public academic exchanges, angrily denouncing Qianlong for "ruling for more than 60 years is not beneficial to the people's livelihood and is a historical sinner". The remarks caused an uproar and fierce disagreements on the Internet. Some support the frank truth, while others think it is too one-sided. Qianlong's rule, is it the king of Ming or the king of darkness?This is a hotly debated topic.
Six trips to the south of the Yangtze River, power and social stability.
In the fourteenth year of Qianlong, Emperor Qianlong visited Jiangnan six times, and this action was highly controversial. Compared with Kangxi's southern tour, Qianlong's six trips to the south of the Yangtze River are not only an imitation of his ancestors, but also an observation of the actual situation in the south. At that time, the economic prosperity of the water towns in the south of the Yangtze River was an important support point for the Qing Dynasty, but it also gave birth to the anti-Qing ideology. Qianlong's southern tour was not only an on-the-spot investigation, but also aimed at stabilizing Jiangnan and eliminating social contradictions.
The southern tour caused controversy, and the waste of social wealth became a hidden danger.
However, the southern tour also placed a heavy burden on local officials and merchants, and consumed huge financial and human resources. Roads were built and fields were demolished along the way, resulting in a waste of social wealth and breeding extravagance and corruption. After Qianlong's abdication, he expressed remorse, saying that the southern tour "wastes money and wastes money, and it is useless and beneficial."
Positive role and social influence, Jiangnan prospers and develops.
Although the southern tour brought a series of problems, it also had a positive effect. It has promoted the south, expanded the channels of commodity circulation, and promoted the commercial prosperity of the south of the Yangtze River. Qianlong's southern tour also helped to dismantle the traditional feudal mode of production and allow capitalism to flourish in China. The exchange with Jiangnan scholars and the rise of the Qianjia school are inseparable.
Suppression of rebellions, strategic guidance and aftermath measures.
In the twentieth year of Qianlong, Qianlong ordered the suppression of the Junggar rebellion, and completed the decades-long contradiction between the two sides in only two years. Qianlong showed clear and accurate strategic guidance for the war effort, and was committed to stabilizing the domestic situation and ensuring political and financial stability. After the reunification of Xinjiang, Qianlong consolidated the reunification of Xinjiang with the interior and promoted Xinjiang's economic development through a series of measures, such as unimpeded transportation and economic development.
Qianlong's aftermath measures unified the stable development of Xinjiang.
Qianlong abolished the first checkpoint and strengthened cultural and spiritual exchanges between the mainland and Xinjiang. He dispatched officers and soldiers to build major transportation routes between Xinjiang and the hinterland, forming a transportation network connecting Xinjiang and the hinterland. These aftermath measures stabilized the situation in Xinjiang and ensured that there would be no major recurrence of war after the war.
Qianlong's compilation and revision of the "Four Libraries Quanshu" protects and inherits the culture.
In the twenty-fourth year of Qianlong, after quelling the Junggar rebellion, Qianlong paid attention to the preservation of ancient books and classics, and decided to concentrate the resources of the Qing Dynasty to compile and revise the "Siku Quanshu". Through extensive collection, screening, identification, and proofreading, he completed this series of 79,000 volumes containing more than 3,500 titles in ten years. This work preserves and sorts out many classical cultures in our country and makes positive contributions to the cultural history of the Chinese nation.
Looking at Qianlong's rule, merit and demerit coexist.
Although there were problems during Qianlong's reign, he made great achievements in politics, military, economy and culture, and reached the peak of traditional feudal society. History has not yet determined Qianlong's evaluation, but his reign occupies an important page in Chinese history.
Conclusion: Pondering the reign of Qianlong, the historical evaluation is controversial.
Yi Zhongtian's criticism of Qianlong attracted widespread attention, but there was also a positive side to Qianlong's rule. Whether it is the Ming Monarch or the Faint Lord needs to be thought deeply. Qianlong left a strong mark in Chinese history, and we should treat his contributions with hospitality while fully understanding his shortcomings, so as to form a more comprehensive historical evaluation.
After reading above about Yi Zhongtian's criticism of Qianlong's reign and Qianlong's series of ruling actions in history, we can't help but fall into complex thoughts about this Qing emperor. The historical controversy is all the more striking by the fiery rhetoric of Yi Zhongtian, whose reign is portrayed in the article as both positive and flawed.
First, Yi Zhongtian's criticism of Qianlong focused on his six trips to the south of the Yangtze River. Yi Zhongtian believes that the waste of financial manpower and the impact on social stability caused by the six southern tours left a negative impression on Qianlong's people. However, the article also points out the strategic determination behind the southern tour and its role in promoting the economic prosperity of the south. This depiction of both sides makes the reader think about Qianlong's true intentions during his trip to the south of the Yangtze River.
Second, Qianlong's military wisdom and strategic determination in quelling the Junggar rebellion have also become the focus of commentary. His strategic guiding principles, including the stabilization of the domestic situation, ensuring political and financial stability, and the adoption of measures to deal with the aftermath, demonstrate the foresight of a monarch. However, in the course of the war, Qianlong's approach to slaughtering cities and killing people was also criticized. This allowed Qianlong's reign to maintain a delicate balance between merit and demerit.
In addition, Qianlong's focus on culture was also one of the highlights of his reign. The compilation and revision of the Siku Quanshu shows the importance he attaches to the inheritance of Chinese culture. This point was positively evaluated by the article, which believed that Qianlong's efforts in the field of culture provided valuable literature resources for future generations.
However, Qianlong's reign also had its dark side. The *** problems mentioned in the article, as well as the waste of social wealth brought about by the six trips to the south of the Yangtze River, are all problems that cannot be ignored during the Qianlong period. These negative factors made Qianlong's reign highly controversial and his evaluations divided.
Overall, Qianlong, as one of the most outstanding emperors of the Qing Dynasty, experienced both glory and disgrace in his reign. In the evaluation of history, we should view his merits and demerits from an objective and comprehensive perspective. Although Yi Zhongtian's criticism is fierce, it also reflects the multifaceted nature of historical figures from different perspectives. This kind of historical debate is an opportunity to stimulate historical thinking, prompting us to understand the past more deeply, so that we can better face the present and the future.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!