The sight of Hamas fighters recently challenging Israeli tanks in ** as death squads has caused a heated discussion among military enthusiasts around the world. ** Shows a Hamas militant sneaking up on an Israeli army tank in the rubble with an explosives bag and successfully destroying it. After igniting the explosive pack, he immediately fled, and immediately a huge fireball rose up, destroying the Israeli tank in an instant. While this kind of scene is common in movies, it is still shocking on a real-life battlefield. The incident raised questions about the Israeli army's ability to coordinate with the infantry. Despite the fact that tanks are regarded as the kings of land warfare, the lack of close coordination and cover of infantry makes even a heavy ** as a tank extremely vulnerable.
It can be seen from the ** that there are obvious flaws in the Israeli army's defense system, perhaps due to miscommunication, deployment errors, or underestimation of Hamas tactics, which may be the potential cause of this incident. Although the Israeli army is strong, Hamas's tough counterattack on the battlefield has made Israel very distressed, which seems to reflect the epitome of Israel's predicament, unable to fully suppress Hamas, and under international pressure. The United States, as an ally of Israel, is also facing a grim situation. The United States has once again become the focus of international attention. It can be seen that the superpower, which once seemed to be able to influence the whole situation, is now inadequate. In the face of the worsening crisis in Ukraine and the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, the United States seems to have fallen into an unprecedented predicament.
Historically, the United States has always found opportunities to benefit from conflicts, from arms sales to strategic layout, and its methods have been exemplary. However, with the waning influence of the United States, things do not seem to be going as smoothly as before. The worsening crisis in Ukraine and the escalation of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict have put the United States in a difficult position. In the Ukraine crisis, the United States originally hoped to deal a fatal blow to Russia through pressure, sanctions and other means, while consolidating relations with European allies and increasing ** sales and economic interests. However, the reality is more complicated than expected, and the Russia-Ukraine war has brought not only economic pressure to the West, but also a strategic passivity. There seems to be a subtle change in the position of the United States on the issue of dealing with Ukraine.
The position of fully supporting Ukraine has gradually shifted to the pursuit of stability and reconciliation, and even abandoning Ukraine is no longer an option that the United States cannot imagine. In addition, the United States has always been Israel's staunch backing, but the recent Israeli harm to civilians, especially women and children, has caused great resentment in the Middle East, and American support seems to be beginning to waver. In the face of aggressive counterattacks by the Houthis and other armed forces in the Middle East, the attitude of the United States is even more elusive. Although support for Israel remains, the inner contradictions and unease are also evident. The Houthis' statements and actions have made their position clear: they do not have too many concerns, and they do not even rule out a direct attack on the United States. This direct, aggressive attitude sends a signal that in the face of anger and despair, no matter how formidable an adversary can be targeted.
This has raised fears that the situation in the Middle East could develop in a new, more dangerous direction. In the face of this series of complex situations, the outside world cannot help but wonder how the United States will respond. With the adjustment of US foreign policy and the changes in the domestic situation, will there be a fundamental change in the attitude of the United States?The deep-seated issues reflected behind these incidents undoubtedly require deep consideration by the United States. Now that the United States is starting to find it difficult to cope, how to extricate itself from the current predicament has become crucial. The United States seems to have sent a signal that it wants China to play a key role. Kirby, the White House spokesman for security liaison, suddenly threw an olive branch to China in an attempt to use China's influence to calm tensions in the Middle East. This signal undoubtedly shocked the outside world.
The U.S. statement clearly reflects a subtle change: the U.S. needs China to ease the smell of gunpowder in the Middle East. At the same time, on the Ukraine crisis, the United States has also shown a posture of seeking China's assistance. Earlier, the phone call between France's Macron and the United States' Biden showed that the two sides agreed to engage with China to end tensions in Ukraine as soon as possible, and even both sides hope that China can play a certain role in promoting the common development of developing and developed countries. How will China respond to the "help" signal issued by the US side?Before this, we must first explain China's attitude towards the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and the Ukraine crisis. At the end of November, China issued the "China's Position Paper on the Settlement of the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict", which put forward concrete and pragmatic proposals, starting with a comprehensive ceasefire and cessation of hostilities.
China has a firm stance on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and the Ukraine crisis, and is willing to provide assistance under the premise of peace. The United States has turned to China for support, but China's position may not be exactly the same as that of the United States. China will continue to stand its ground. With regard to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, China has proposed a series of solutions, which are not just slogans, but call on all parties to earnestly implement the relevant resolutions of the UN General Assembly and the Security Council, and uphold the spirit of a lasting and sustained humanitarian truce. It starts with the protection of innocent civilians, the obligation to comply with international humanitarian law, the cessation of violence against civilians, the refraining from attacks on civilian installations, and the basic safety of innocent people. The second is to open the door to humanitarian relief in the Gaza Strip to ensure unimpeded access to relief and prevent further deterioration of the disaster.
Strengthen diplomatic mediation to de-escalate the crisis, and ultimately focus on a political solution that will lead to the realization of the two-state solution. China has also expressed similar concerns about the Ukraine crisis. China will stand on the side of dialogue and peace, and on the right side of history. China also called on rationality and restraint to become particularly valuable in the current situation, which can prevent the further escalation and spread of the crisis. China will continue to work hard to achieve a de-escalation or even a complete solution to the crisis.