Evidence is an indispensable part of litigation, but whether evidence needs to be notarized is a complex issue.
In civil litigation, evidence needs to meet certain forms and requirements. In general, the evidence should be true, legitimate, relevant, and able to prove the facts to be proven. In most cases, evidence does not need to be notarized, only formal requirements need to be met. For example, in civil litigation, common evidence includes contracts, invoices, receipts, **, etc., as long as these evidence meet the form and requirements of the law, it can be used as valid evidence.
However, in some exceptional cases, evidence may need to be notarized. For example, in cases involving foreign nationals or foreigners, due to language and cultural differences, it may be necessary to notarize to confirm the authenticity and legitimacy of the evidence. In addition, in some cases involving intellectual property rights, patent rights, etc., due to the strong professionalism and complexity, it may also be necessary to notarize to ensure the accuracy and credibility of the evidence.
In addition to the above, there are some other situations where notarized evidence may be required. For example, in some cases involving property disputes, it may be necessary to confirm the ownership and ownership of the property through notarization. In some cases involving contract disputes, notarization can be used to confirm the authenticity and legitimacy of the contract.
In conclusion, whether the evidence needs to be impartial depends on the circumstances. Therefore, when it comes to litigation, it is advisable for the parties to consult a professional lawyer to determine whether notarized evidence is required.
Tips: If you have any doubts about the notarization of evidence, you can consult the Qidu evidence team to escort your notarization.
*From: Qidu Chuang's legal affairs Author: Lan Xiaoer.