Without notarization, the evidence is invalid, what is wrong with this sentence?

Mondo Social Updated on 2024-01-29

The phrase "without notarization, evidence is invalid" is not entirely accurate from a legal point of view, because the validity of evidence does not depend solely on whether it has been notarized or not. Notarization can indeed enhance the legal effect of evidence, but this does not mean that evidence without notarization is necessarily invalid.

According to Chinese laws, there are three main types of notarization effects: evidentiary effect, enforceable effect of creditor's rights document, and constitutive effect of legal act elements. Among them, the evidentiary effect is the most basic effect of notarization. The evidentiary effect of notarization is extensive, not only in litigation activities, but also in daily civil, economic and administrative activities. A notarial deed is a reliable legal document that proves the authenticity and legitimacy of legal acts, legally significant facts and documents.

In the absence of notarization, evidence can still be valid, but its probative force may be limited to a certain extent. For example, in litigation activities, evidence that has not been notarized may require additional proof, or its probative force may not be as strong as notarized evidence. But this does not mean that evidence that has not been notarized is invalid.

In general, notarization can improve the reliability and probative power of evidence, but it does not mean that evidence without notarization is necessarily invalid.

Tips: If you have any doubts about evidence notarization, you can consult with the Qidu evidence team to escort your evidence notarization and support plan. **From: Qidu Chuang's legal affairs Author: arancia

Related Pages