According to the Chinese Satellite News Agency, former US military intelligence ** Scottlett said in a recent interview that NATO countries are trying to inform Ukraine that now is the best time to end the Russian-Ukrainian conflict and that there is no better opportunity to sign a contract than now. Tomorrow and the day after tomorrow may be even more unfavorable for Ukraine.
Recently, the outbreak of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and Ukraine's poor performance on the battlefield have led to a weakening of Western confidence in Ukraine. It is almost a well-known fact that the West is trying to push for rapprochement with Ukraine and Russia and to end the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. For example, a few days ago, Germany imposed a "limit" on the assistance provided by the United States and Germany to Ukraine, forcing Ukraine to take the initiative to seek reconciliation.
However, to advance the rapprochement between Ukraine and Russia, now is not the best time to sign a contract with Wu Yu. From an objective point of view, the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is currently underway, and the forces of Europe and the United States are being constrained. If Ukraine reconciles with Russia at this time, Russia will actually have more of the initiative, which is not good for Ukraine.
So why are NATO countries saying that Ukraine is now the best time for peace talks with Russia?This can be understood from several different perspectives. First of all, from the perspective of Europe and the United States, the so-called "now is the best time for Russia-Ukraine peace talks" actually shows the impatience of Europe and the United States towards the Russia-Ukraine conflict. That is essentially the lie of ending the contradiction and not wanting to support Ukraine anymore.
To be honest, Europe and the United States do not want to fight anymore, but the Ukrainian Zelansky **hopes that Europe and the United States will come to the aid of more**, depleting Ukraine and Russia. Against this background, the West is trying to convince Ukraine that the sooner the contract is signed, the more beneficial it will be for Ukraine. "Everyone already knows that Ukraine lost the war, Russia won, and the United States and the West cannot change the outcome," Scott Ritter, a U.S. intelligence, said in an interview. "Therefore, the later the time drags on, the more unfavorable the situation will be for Kyiv.
To some extent, this view still makes sense. Because for Ukraine, the only will to continue the war depends on American assistance, which is now decreasing. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has distracted the United States, and at the same time, Biden has lost trust in Zelensky. Moreover, the Republican Party's restraint on the Democratic Party is a combination of subjective and objective justifications before the anti-war voices in the United States and ** are coming. Urging the United States to have no way to provide more military aid to Ukraine. And, over time, the influence that the United States can exert in Biden's country will be influenced by the Republican Party.
In layman's terms, with the House of Representatives being controlled by the Republicans, Biden is actually turning into a "lame duck" whose power is shrinking. In other words, the United States is providing less and less assistance to Ukraine, which is an objectively realistic trend. In this context, while Europe and the United States have not completely torn apart, they are only secretly forcing Ukraine to reconcile with Russia, Zelensky will go to talk about peace with Russia. Then in the course of this dialogue, Europe and the United States can ostensibly put pressure on Russia and fight for better stories and conditions for Ukraine. However, if the United States and the European Union lose confidence further and openly demand a rapprochement between Ukraine and Russia, and demand a rapprochement between Ukraine and Russia, it will be tantamount to Ukraine losing the support of the United States and the West. In the face of Russia, Kiev's bargaining chips and temperament will become smaller. From this point of view, it is also reasonable for the United States and Western countries to say that Ukraine and Russia are the best time for reconciliation.
But from the point of view of Ukraine, such behavior of Europe and the United States is, of course, irresponsible. It is the United States and the West that support Ukraine and Russia in their fight, and now the United States and the West have expressed their desire not to continue to support Ukraine because they believe that Ukraine cannot win against Russia. Continuing the war will only cause losses in vain. But in fact, it is well known that Ukraine cannot defeat Russia, which is the fact that Ukraine was too far from Russia in terms of comprehensive national and military strength at the beginning of the war. Even with the support of the United States and Western countries, it is normal that it will not be able to defeat Russia. It's not normal to be able to fight Russia. From this point of view, now the United States and the West in the name of Ukraine having already lost the war.
Forcing Ukraine to reconcile is clearly somewhat untenable. Second, according to Chinese spokesperson Hua Chunying, China has always been actively involved in international affairs and is committed to maintaining world peace and stability. China attaches great importance to the development of Sino-Russian relations and is willing to play a positive role in promoting the continuous development of bilateral relations.