When looking at the construction achievements of the first era, people are prone to fall into extreme views, especially for the development model of the first 30 years of New China. There are some people who have a completely negative attitude, and regard the construction achievements and development models of the first era as useless. However, this view is extreme and erroneous, and it is necessary to draw more objective conclusions through analysis under specific historical conditions.
Some critics believe that in the early days of the People's Republic of China, instead of giving priority to the development of heavy industry in accordance with the advantages of "factor endowments", it violated the comparative advantages of resource endowments. However, this analysis ignores the most pressing issue facing China at the time: survival and security. New China had just been established and was subject to Western blockades, embargoes, and even military threats. In such a situation, giving priority to the development of light industry and foreign trade industry can lead to the strangulation of the country or the becoming a vassal of the West. Under the premise of ensuring national independence, the Communist Party of China chose to give priority to the development of heavy industry, which is not a preference, but a helpless choice under historical conditions.
Some analytical methods see the differences between heavy and light industry in a one-sided way, but they sever the links between them. Even if China allowed the market economy and private capital to develop light industry at that time, it would be constrained by factors such as raw materials and agriculture. Under the historical conditions at that time, China had not yet established a complete industrial system, and the rush to join the international division of labor system might lock China into the low end of the industrial chain, unable to carry out independent innovation and industrial upgrading.
China of the times has unique advantages, including a large population, a vast geographical area, a huge domestic market potential, and a fair social foundation established through social revolution. Under these conditions, the Communist Party of China has made full use of these advantages and embarked on a unique development model characterized by giving priority to the development of heavy industry.
Some people have criticized New China for implementing a distribution method of "high accumulation and low consumption" in order to give priority to the development of heavy industry, which has led to a slow improvement in the people's living standards. However, this model of development was necessary under the historical conditions of the time. The premise for improving the people's living standards is to have a solid foundation for heavy industry, and without this foundation, industries closely related to the people's livelihood, such as modern agriculture and textiles, will not be able to develop.
**Although the "high accumulation, low consumption" development model of the era has paid a price, it has been relatively small compared to the early industrialization of other countries. The pitfalls of the early industrialization of Western countries, such as the enclosure movement, mass unemployment, and sharp polarization, were avoided. In addition, the fruits of high accumulation were not appropriated by interest groups, but were transformed into state-owned capital, laying a solid foundation for the success of the reform and opening up period.
The tremendous achievements made in the past 40 years of reform and opening up have been built to a large extent on the basis of the times. The people of the whole country have experienced all kinds of difficulties and paid the price in the first era, and today's success should be shared by the people of the whole country. Unswervingly leading the people of the whole country to take the road of "common prosperity" is the continuation and development of the development model of the times.
To sum up, the development model of the ** era is not useless, and its rationality and uniqueness under specific historical conditions provide a more profound perspective for contemporary people to understand and recognize history. When evaluating history, we need to go beyond extreme viewpoints, analyze carefully, and face the past with a more objective attitude, so as to better respond to the challenges of the present and the future.
The article "The Development Model of the Times: Historical Investigation and Realistic Cognition" deeply analyzes the development model of the times, which not only highlights its rationality under special historical conditions, but also makes a powerful refutation of critical views. Here are some comments on the article:
First of all, the article is thought-provoking through the interpretation of the development model of the times. In particular, the choice of prioritizing the development of heavy industry in the early stage underscores the extreme dilemma faced by China at that time, that is, the survival and security of the new country in the context of the blockade, embargo, and military threat of the West, ensuring the survival and security of the country is a top priority. This allows readers to more clearly understand the historical logic behind the decisions of the *** era, as well as the realistic rationality of its development model.
Secondly, the article has deep insights into the criticism of one-sided analysis. By emphasizing the connection between heavy industry and light industry, the article points out that even if China allowed the market economy and private capital to develop light industry, it would be constrained by various factors such as raw materials and agriculture. This comprehensive and in-depth analysis provides readers with a more comprehensive historical perspective, avoiding overly simplistic and biased interpretations of historical fragments.
In addition, the paper also strongly expounds on the distribution mode of high accumulation and low consumption. The article pointed out that under the historical conditions at that time, in order to improve the people's living standards, it was necessary to have a solid foundation for heavy industry. This is a profound rebuttal to some critics who only see slow improvements in living standards and ignore the real challenges of infrastructure. Through examples of barefoot doctors and rural medical conditions, the article gives the reader a better understanding of the limitations and constraints of the time.
Finally, the article fully affirmed the achievements made during the reform and opening up period, and emphasized that this success was built on the basis of the first era. This perspective of inheritance and development enables readers to see a continuation of the development model of the times, as well as its positive contribution to the success of today's China.
Overall, this article not only has a profound historical insight when analyzing the development model of the times, but also enables readers to have a more comprehensive understanding of the historical background and decision-making at that time through reasonable arguments and explanations. The objective and meticulous treatment of historical issues in this article provides readers with space for in-depth thinking, prompts us to look at history more rationally, and better responds to complex and ever-changing social challenges at present.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!