On December 22, the car emperor announced the model performance rankings of each item in the winter testIn the battery life ranking of pure electric vehicles, Hiphi YBeat Xpeng, Weilai, BYD and other modelsWon the first place in the measured battery life
It is really surprising that Gaohe won the first place on the list, because Gaohe is neither a popular brand nor an Internet celebrity model, so it can be said that it is far behind in the sales list of new forces. 
From the beginning of its establishment, HiPhi has positioned a high-end luxury model with a unit price of 60-800,000 yuan, which is no less than that of NIO. 
Hiphi Y, the most recent monthly sales of 573 units, this year's cumulative sales of 3735 units, the official guide price is 3390-44.900,000;HiPhi Z, with a recent monthly sales of 107 units, has sold a total of 329 units this year, and the official guide price is 6000-80.000000;HiPhi X, with a recent monthly sales of 16 units, has sold a total of 201 units this year, and the official guide price is 5700-80.000000;
The test model participating in the winter test of the car emperor this time is the 2023 Hiphi Y flagship version, which is positioned as a medium and large SUV, close to the mainstream models of the same level in the market. Equipped with CATL's 115kWh battery pack, the official CLTC range is 765kmThe measured battery life is 4188km, the range achievement rate is 5475%。
You look at the mileage and the endurance achievement rate at the same time, isn't it a bit trance?That's rightThis ranking is based on the actual cruising range, not the cruising rate of the last hybrid ratio。Judging from the measured cruising range value, Gaohe is the first in place, and there is nothing wrong with it!Understand that the Che Emperor has set the rules, and according to this rule, Gao He is the first.
But do other brands recognize this result?If compared with the battery life achievement rate ranking, it can be seen that the battery quality, battery life technology, and battery density of each model can promote the battery technology of each brand to continue to improve. But if you compare the absolute value of battery life, it is not meaningful and fair,Isn't it who has more battery stacks, and whoever has a large battery, who can take the first placeIsn't it unfair to have a battery with a high endurance achievement rate and good quality technology, but a smaller capacity?
Compared with the absolute value of the cruising range, it will only make everyone pile batteries on the car and make the battery bigger, rather than increasing the battery density and improving the battery quality. This ranking index is a very bad guide for the participating brands, which is not conducive to promoting the progress of industry technology and materials, but stays at making the battery bigger.
Just like the test car ET7 with 150 large batteries of NIO a few days ago, with such a large battery, driving at a speed of 90 yards, and running out of a range of 1044 kilometers, how much significance does it make?Having the ability to make the battery small and have a long battery life is the real technology. If it is larger, I believe that it will not take a few days for someone to surpass NIO.
It seems that the industry tested, stillIt is necessary to formulate a professional testing mechanism and professional testing standardsIt can not only truly reflect the technical strength of each car, but also guide the healthy and upward development of the industry, which is a good thing for the market, the brand and the consumer.