Recently, from the "engagement ** case" in Datong, Shanxi Province in May to the 16-year 3 girl non-biological case on the 28th of this month, all point to the fact that the bottom line of human morality and public order and good customs have seriously shrunk, the essence of equality between men and women and half the sky is to advocate the absolute "fairness" and "non-discrimination" atmosphere of men and women, these laws are all reflected, after decades of development and change, the penetration of Western culture and the invasion of the concept of "sexual freedom", our own traditional virtues have long been "fragmented" things are wrong, in [money first] Under the slapping and washing of the trend, most of the Chinese people have long degenerated into "Western", wearing Western clothes and foreign hexagrams, celebrating Western festivals, learning Western plastic surgery and hair dyeing, etc., happily reflecting the unique and uninhibited nobility of the new generation of foreign slaves.
Both cases occurred in the most important period of adolescence in their lives, and we can't see [tradition] and cultural inheritance in them, but only the lack of moral bottom line, the depravity of "copying all over the house" and the femme fatale like "killing people for money"!
The evil of human nature is close to the point of madness, the author has no intention of gossiping, it is true that justice cannot be blasphemed, and goodness cannot be **.
Good and evil will be rewarded in the end, and the list will be pulled sooner or later after autumn!
According to the objective reality of the two cases, the author will intuitively restore and show you the real scene of the crime scene on the basis of some details of the "Shanxi Datong Engagement ** Case", according to the "facts" part on which the judgment of the case is based, and with the objective laws of common sense, customs and things.
According to the part of the judgment of the Yanggao County People's Court in Shanxi Province on the admission of evidence and the determination of facts, the excerpts are as follows:
After the court's trial, it was ascertained that on January 30, 2023, the defendant Xi XX and the victim were introduced to each other by a local marriage agency. On May 1, the man's family held an engagement banquet, the two parties signed a marriage contract, and the man paid 100,000 dowry money in advance, and on May 2, the woman went back to the house to invite a wine to Xi, and in the afternoon of the same day, a pair of prospective newlyweds were in the house of a community in Yanggao County, the man
The defendant forcibly had sexual relations with the victim despite the victim's resistance. The victim called the police that night. After investigation and evidence collection by the Yanggao County Public Security Bureau, compulsory measures of criminal detention were taken against the defendant on May 5. On June 27, the Yanggao County People's Procuratorate charged the defendant with the crime of ** and filed a public prosecution with the Yanggao County People's Court. On the 25th of this month, because the case involved personal privacy, the Yanggao County People's Court tried the case in closed public in accordance with the law. The court of first instance held that the defendant forcibly had sexual relations with the victim against the victim's will, which violated Article 236 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China and constituted a crime of **, and sentenced the defendant to three years imprisonment in accordance with law. After the verdict was announced, the defendant Xi XX was not satisfied and appealed.
The above is the content of the evidence confirmed by the court through investigation, and at present, 90% of the society's understanding and attitude towards this case believe that the actual sentence of sentencing the man to three years in prison is generally felt to be too heavy.
After a full study of the before and after comparison, the attitude of the parents of both sides towards the marriage of the child, the man's family seems more sincere, and the woman does not feel that there is anything abnormal except that she is more interested in money
First, the woman's mother and the woman herself were only interested in the man's money and real estate and had obvious motives, not only did they enter into a prenuptial "bride price" agreement in the form of a written contract at the man's engagement banquet, but the woman also used "refusal of premarital sex" to coerce and regulate the man
From this point of analysis, in their eyes, marital love and family happiness must not be as important as money and real estate, and it is okay to leave the feelings and family dependence of money. Therefore, the 200,000 cash and the bride price of a set of real estate is their ultimate goal, and the magic weapon to ensure that this purpose will not fail is "sexual blackmail", and then because of the "advantage" taken by the fiancé (the man must have promised in advance, otherwise he would not agree to be with **), it is the thing that caused her to have a crazy fever wardrobe curtains, break out of the door and frantically toss to frighten her fiancé, and finally use "**This" to harm others and herself to achieve her goal of accumulating money, you can also see how unconfident this person's heart is;
Second, regardless of the possibility that the man had promised the woman anything beforehand, it is judged by the woman's violent personality (as seen from the ignition of the cabinet and curtains) and the confirmation of the public security examination (the woman's only bruises on the armpit and big arm are normal in other places), and there was no possibility of violent acts such as "beating, drug and knife and stick threats" in the marriage room at that time, and the only thing that can be explained is that there are only two possibilities for "the woman is not injured except for her hands and arms" and is ** (coma transaction).
In the case that the court has confirmed the fact of "violence", then it can be 100% certain that it must be a false lawsuit case that was traded in advance and reversed afterwards, and there is no possibility of ** here.
It must be that the man has made a clear promise before having sex, and because he cannot fulfill it afterwards, the woman is afraid that "no sex is allowed before marriage" This bargaining chip for money was destroyed, worried that the latter would not be able to get these dowries, so he simply did not do two things and deliberately made a fuss, and burned the cabinet and curtains, opened the door and deliberately shouted for help, and ran down to the thirteenth floor to make a fuss, the fiancé had never seen this kind of scene, and he was afraid that the woman would have an accident if she was anxious, so he hurriedly went downstairs and pulled the woman desperately into the room, and the bruises on the arms of the hands were in line with the bruises formed by a person from behind, from the 13th floor to the 14th floor from the bottom to the top).
Third, judging according to the principle of "seeking wealth but not life" of the wealth collector, it can be determined that the woman's original intention is not really to want the other party to go to prison and report it** , She just wants to get the psychology of money, and she just wants to get the bride price of 100,000 yuan in cash and real estate and name as soon as possible, but it backfired, and she didn't expect that it would lead to the serious consequences of the other party being sentenced to 3 years in prison by the court (it's terrible not to understand the law), it was originally just a means to scare and coerce her husband's family to hurry up, but because the police triggered the criminal prosecution procedure, the criminal offense is not better than a civil dispute, it is not a crime that is transferred by personal will, so it caused the consequences of the fiancé's three-year prison sentence today, and now it is too late to regret it!I can only go one way to the dark.
But the consequences have been caused, no one can "hold back", and a person and a family are ruined like this.
God knows if something will happen next?
Is the woman ready?
Will the local community be left unaware of this consequence?
According to the objective fact that the man has been detained for more than 200 days, it must be impossible to acquit him in the second trial, and the best outcome is to apply a suspended sentence to reduce the anger of the parties (although the political influence has been caused, it may still be accepted), otherwise something will definitely happen.
Now, the woman and the local public procuratorate and law department have been riding the tiger hard, and I would like to advise the woman:
Don't hurt anyone, hurry up and issue a letter of understanding!
Finally, I borrowed a joke from netizens to reflect the netizens' cold view of today's social atmosphere.
Now it's too simple for women to slander men, and with a light sentence of sexual harassment, Zhu Jun was disgraced, men and women, now in front of the law, men are at an absolute disadvantage!If you don't take something to protect yourself, you can be slandered if you wear a shoe**!
Society is progressing, laws and regulations have to keep up, criminal law in the sense of [against women's will], is the best "sword" to accurately protect women and children's personality rights and rights to life and health from being illegally infringed, but because of the lack of supervision and mechanical abuse over the years, it seems to be the same as [picking quarrels and provoking trouble], it has become the most criticized embarrassing method to hurt people, to distinguish whether it is illegal infringement in the real sense, we must pay attention to analyzing the relationship between the two parties, the place of violation, the place and the physical characteristics of the victim, etc., combined with objective reasons, Use common sense and habits in life to comprehensively consider the facts of the case, distinguish the truth from the false, do not wrongfully accuse an innocent person or let go of a treacherous evil, and immediately deal with a case of false reporting as a case, and "kill chickens and set an example for monkeys" to set an example.
The editor has no intention of questioning the fairness of Taiping, but hopes that the soul of injustice will not be [reborn].