A society governed by the rule of law relies on the legal system, and the law is fair and strict, so that the criminal law has practical significance, but wrongful judgments and wrongful convictions are desecrating the sanctity and majesty of the law.
It is reported that 22 years ago, there was a shocking case in the second group of Jiulong Village, Shiyan Town, Dongtai City.
On the evening of May 31, 2001, at the behest of village cadre Qiu Changlin, villager He Jiangzeng went to the home of another villager, Zhu Zhicai, to inform the meeting of the villagers' representative meeting. At that time, the adulterer and adulteress immediately retorted against He Jiangzeng ** woman.
Although he later came to the police station to comment, and the police station also performed its official duties, he Jiangzeng, a woman who claimed to have been bitten to death by Song Yinping, was convicted and unjustly imprisoned.
In 2005, after He Jiangzeng was released from prison, the first thing he did was to go to the Hougang Police Station to appeal and ask for an explanation for his injustice.
He Jiangzeng was mentally prepared for a long time, knowing that the appeal would be very difficult, and the road of appeal would be 18 years old, and there was still no end in sight!
How many loopholes are there in the unjust case for more than 20 years?Everyone knows the truth, so why can't the victims be cleared?There is something else behind the case?Or is it a judicial loophole?
22 years ago, Song Yinping's testimony against He Jiangzeng** was only one-sided, and no substantive evidence was issued, which was insufficient evidence in the legal sense. Moreover, He Jiangzeng strenuously denied that he had not been fairly accepted by the party premises. The evidence in the case as a whole is doubtful and insufficient to draw an objective conclusion.
If the crime can be determined only on the basis of the unilateral identification of the victim woman, then how can the law be fair and objective?How can the public procuratorate and law strictly enforce the law?
The most untenable thing is that the police station actually decided that the thinking and behavior logic of another woman who went to someone else's house was established, and it was a big joke in the world!
And there was a third person and a man present at the time, in this case, it is impossible to constitute a ** fact, and it is even more suspicious!
He Jiangzeng was dispatched by the village cadres to notify the male villagers to hold a meeting on the spot, but he did not know that a woman was present, and there was neither a motive nor a condition for committing the crime.
With such a big loophole, the judiciary turned a blind eye!
In the years of complaining, He Jiangzeng and Song Yinhua had a confrontation, and Song Yinping admitted in public that he slept with Zhu Zhicai (adultery) and framed He Jiangzeng!Song Yinping's husband, Xu Xinhua, said that he also claimed to know that Zhu Zhicai and Song Yinhua deliberately framed He Jiangzeng!The witness, Zhu Zhicai, also said that he regretted that he had committed perjury at that time.
* Crime (236) Sexual relations with a woman by violence, coercion or other means.
All kinds of facts prove that He Jiangzeng has never had contact with Song Yinhua. So how did the judicial organs come to the conclusion that He Jiangzeng was convicted?
He Jiangzeng clearly remembered that when he did not admit his guilt, Wei Changhui of the police station beat him until he was unconscious, and after waking up, he recounted what Wei Changhui asked to say in a daze to assist them in handling the case and collecting evidence.
Article 247 of the Criminal Law clearly stipulates that extorting confessions by torture and using violent coercion and other means are illegal evidence collection and cannot be used as the basis for legal judgments, and are illegal acts.
He Jiangzeng has been wronged for 22 years, and has filed a complaint with courts at all levels for 22 years, but there has been no result.
In 2005, the Yancheng Intermediate People's Court (2005) Yan Xing Jian Zi No. 0060 rejected the appeal notice, and in 2019, after receiving the Yancheng Municipal People's Procuratorate's Yancheng Municipal People's Procuratorate's Yancheng Municipal People's Procuratorate's Yancheng Municipal People's Procuratorate Yancheng Provincial
Disappointingly, on November 10, 2021, He Jiang was added to the Jiangsu Provincial High People's Court and rejected the notice of appeal.
On September 5, 2022, the Beijing Supreme People's Court received He Jiangzeng and replied to handle it in accordance with the law and severely punish the crime. Subsequently, the Dongtai Housing Beijing Office, the Shiyan Town Letters and Visits Office of Dongtai City, the Yancheng Intermediate People's Court, the Shiyan Police Station of the Dongtai People's Court, the Jiulong Village Party Committee, and other leading departments at all levels and relevant leaders intervened in the work of appealing against the unjust case, repeatedly stressing that He Jiangzeng had to go through formal channels and legal procedures, but the problem was never resolved
On June 18, 2023, He Jiangzeng had no choice but to take the car to Beijing again but was stopped by the Dongtai Municipal Letters and Visits Bureau, and was asked to write a letter of guarantee after being brought back by the Shiyan Town Xinfang Police Station and village cadres, promising not to go to Beijing in the future. Petitioning is a legal right for citizens to speak, and it is one of the formal channels and legal procedures.
Is this stripping of He Jiangzeng's legitimate rights and interests in the name of work?
The achievements made in the work of cracking down on a large number of unjust, false and wrongly decided cases make us full of confidence in the judicial system
He Jiangzeng is not guilty!Give him justice!Return his innocence!