Recently, the hybrid model released by Chedi has a winter rangeAchievement rateThe test results caused an uproar. Yu ChengdongThe article angrily denounced the test method of understanding Chedi, saying that it misled the public. This has also aroused questions from many car company executives and netizens, believing that there is a problem with the test method of understanding Chedi. However, the car emperor did not give in, but conducted a second test on December 14, personally inviting car companies and ** to witness to prove fairness and justice. The results of this test show thatHuaweiPure electric battery lifeAchievement rateOnly 6%, with the number one rankingBYDThe difference is 468%。Although the test method is controversial, the autonomy performance is lowHuaweiThe question community is still attracting people's attention.
Although the test method of Chedi does not conform to the international mainstream test procedures, as long as the test conditions are consistent, the credibility of the results can be guaranteed. After all, the technology of each car company is different, and the performance in the extreme environment is naturally different. However,HuaweiDoes the fact that the test score is at the bottom of this test mean that consumers should be suspicious?Recently, the people praised Thalys, a platform for the world, emphasizing the strengthening of the corporate brand with strict quality. This recognition shows that domesticCarsThe development of the brand has been valued and affirmed. However, understand what the car emperor doesCarsProfessional, should be aware of their own responsibility and influence, should not use the influence of the first to guide.
Although the test method of Chedi has reference and spur significance for the development of domestic car companies, it does not conform to the actual car situation of most people. For consumers, the results of this test are of little significance. On the contrary, it may give domesticCarsThe brand has a negative impact, which makes people question that "the recharge is not in place" or deliberately smeared. It is hoped that the state can formulate a standard testing process as soon as possible, so as to avoid car companies from questioning the test results under the pretext that the test method does not meet the standards, and also provide consumers with a better reference to avoid the situation of "buying a 'dad' to go home".
Yu ChengdongRadiating "cold air", the people named Thalys, and this controversy over the test results of Chedi sparked extensive discussions. Faced with such a situation, we can't help but reflect: as a self-editor, are we aware of our responsibilities and influence?Should we be more cautious in expressing our views and make an objective analysis based on the actual situation?At the same time, car companies should also realize that only by continuously improving product quality and meeting the actual needs of consumers can they stand out in the highly competitive market. For consumers, we should also be more rational about the first report, not confused by one-sided results, and have our own judgment and choice for car purchase decisions.
This series of events provides us with a good food for thought, and also reminds us of the importance of recognizing ourselves and our responsibilities and impacts. Only when we have a clear understanding of ourselves can we better provide valuable information and perspectives to society.