Before reading this article, please click "Follow", which is not only convenient for you to discuss and share, but also can bring you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support!
Recently, an "engagement case" has aroused widespread social concern. According to reports, the defendant Xi XX forcibly had sexual relations with the victim even though he was engaged to the victim, and was charged with the crime of **. The case was pronounced in the first instance, and the defendant Xi XX was sentenced to three years in prison. In this regard, there are ** comments that prospective couples are not the inevitable reason for denial**.
In this case, the defendant Xi XX and the victim were already engaged, but they were not officially married. However, when having sex, Xi Moumou did not get the express consent of the other party, so he was charged with the crime of **. This verdict has sparked heated discussions from all walks of life, and many people believe that since the two parties have been engaged, they should be regarded as husband and wife, and should not be investigated for the crime of **.
In this regard, it has been pointed out that the relationship between prospective husband and wife should not be a reason for negation. Although the parties are engaged, they are not officially married, so they are still legally an ordinary relationship. When having sex, the explicit consent of the other party must be obtained, otherwise it constitutes an ** act. This view is supported by people in the legal profession, who emphasize that the determination of ** crime has nothing to do with the relationship between the two parties, but should be based on whether the other party has explicit consent.
In addition, the case has also triggered a reflection on traditional beliefs. In some people's minds, getting engaged means that both parties are already a family, so having sex is a natural thing. However, this perception does not conform to the legal and moral standards of modern society. In modern society, the will and dignity of the individual are crucial, and the explicit consent of the other person is required to have sex regardless of the relationship.
The verdict of the case also reflects the justice and fairness of the law. Everyone is equal before the law, and no matter what kind of relationship they are in, as long as they force sexual acts against the will of the other party, they should be punished by the law. This verdict is of great significance for upholding social justice and protecting women's rights and interests.
For the public, the case also provides a cautionary tale that the will and dignity of others should be respected at all times, especially on a topic as sensitive as sexuality. Regardless of the relationship, the express consent of the other person must be obtained before sexual intercourse, otherwise it may be a violation of the law. In addition, the public should also raise their legal awareness and understand the relevant laws and regulations, so as to better protect their rights and interests and social justice.
The "engagement case" has aroused widespread social attention and heated discussions. The verdict of this case reflects the justice and fairness of the law, which is of great significance for safeguarding social justice and protecting women's rights and interests. At the same time, the case has also triggered a reflection on traditional concepts and an understanding of laws and regulations, reminding the public of the importance of respecting the will and dignity of others. It is hoped that through the warning effect of this case, the progress and development of society can be promoted.
Progress in the Shanxi Datong Engagement Case
Welcome to leave a message in the comment area below. If you find my answer helpful, please like and comment, it will be the best support and encouragement for me!