There is such a lawyer in life, compared with other lawyers, has the following characteristics:
1. He always "gangs commit crimes", with several lawyers, several paralegals, and several Xi lawyers under him, known as "team combat".
2. He never goes out to pick up cases, but there are always unfinished cases. He is also picky in handling cases, and he never accepts cases that he obviously loses, so he tells the other party to get it himself without looking for a lawyer.
3. He has many consulting units, but he never takes the initiative to go to the consulting units. But once something happens to the consulting unit, he doesn't care about the busyness of his friends, and whether you want to or not, he rushes to the consulting unit to solve the problem.
4. He never accepts food invitations and gifts from his clients, and claims to have a sense of boundary. The client was not surprised, and did not think that he was dissatisfied with his dissatisfaction with his own face.
5. He hardly goes to court ** cases all year round (except for cases with significant local impact or cases with large subject matter), and makes a living by squeezing the surplus labor of "gang members", he eats meat, and his friends drink soup, and it is strange that his friends have no opinion on this.
6. He week.
Sixth, on Sundays, there is always a reason to ask the friends to go to the institute to concentrate on Xi and study cases, as if he is better than others, and he is never worried that the friends will fly alone with hard wings and take away his consultant unit and case source.
7. He never disdains to criticize the court and judges on the Internet or platform like other lawyers in order to attract attention and win the source of the case.
8. He is very cowardly in court, never scolds the judge in the court, and never argues with the judge. Whether it is a local case or a foreign case, he never fights with the judge, and he does not allow his friends to fight to the death.
9. He collects and sorts out a set of evidence, which is useful and useless for the case, and he collects and sorts out the evidence that is beneficial and unfavorable to his own parties, claiming that he does not fight unprepared battles and uncertain battles. In the stage of court investigation and trial evidence presentation and cross-examination, it was seen that he was capable, and the opposing party was at odds with each other, fighting for every inch of land, and did not lose the slightest in the fierce battle.
10. During the court debate, he seems to have changed a person, he disdains to debate with the opposing party, and the court debate will be debated for one round, and the second round will be impatient to say, "See the trial opinions for details", if the other party chatters about the third round, he will come to a sentence "See the ** words after the court for details". 11. If the result of the first instance is not satisfactory, he never encourages the parties to appeal, and he can earn another ** fee if he appeals, but he seems to be a fool as if he doesn't know. 12. When the parties insisted on appealing, the appeal brief he wrote was straightforward and straightforward, without any literary brilliance, and he never wrote the appeal as an indictment. It's no wonder that when his ** case was appealed, the judge of the first instance had no opinion on him, and it was really strange to mention him and praise him. Friends, do you think such a lawyer is "stupid"?
Do you dare to use such a "stupid big fool"?