In ancient times, the concubine was superior to the concubine, and the son was superior to the female, so who has a higher status between the concubine and the concubine?
The ancients said"There is a difference between the descendants and the inferior, and the dignity and the inferiority are orderly", which means that there is a hierarchical difference between the concubine and the concubine, and the concubine is always higher than the concubine.
Since ancient times, emperors have been involved in the issue of establishing heirs, and most of them are also the first to establish concubines, even ordinary families, who value heirs over concubines. We all know that in ancient times, patriarchy was a relatively common phenomenon.
If a wife gives birth to a daughter, and a concubine gives birth to a child, who has a higher status, a concubine or a concubine?
The difference between a concubine and a concubine.
This starts with the marriage system in ancient China. In ancient China, there was monogamy and polygamy, and a man could only marry one wife, but he could take several concubines.
This system led to injustice and inequality between women and concubines. It's called"The gap between the two of them"。
Wife-in-law"The term refers to the children born to the wife and the wife, and is called"Wife-in-law"、"Sister-in-law"with"Daughter-in-law"。
On the other hand,"Concubines"Refers to concubines and children born of concubines, as they are called"Concubinage"、"Concubines"with"Concubines"。They are called"Wife"、"Concubine"with"Concubine"。This kind"There is a difference"The concept was formed before the Tang and Song dynasties, but after the Ming and Qing dynasties, this concept gradually faded.
In the past, a man had to go through three books and six ceremonies to marry a wife, he had to marry in his own department, he could not take a concubine, and if he wanted to break off relations with his wife, he could only write a letter of refusal.
If the woman is compliant"Three no's"conditions, you can't refuse. First, the husband's parents remained religious for three yearsSecond, a man is not a good man when he marries a wife, but after marrying a wife, he is self-reliant and self-reliant, and he is not allowed to leave"Grass wife"；Third, the woman's family has no relatives and no reason, and she is homeless.
If the wife committed"The Seven Deadly Sins", the law allows a man to divorce his wife. In ancient times, the relevant decrees provided for the protection of the status of the wife, and a man could not refuse his wife at will.
In contrast, most concubines do not have to complete it when they get married"Three books and six rites", only a wedding ceremony is required, and some concubines do not even have a wedding ceremony. On top of that, concubines, like men's property, can be bought and sold at will.
Who has a higher status, concubine or concubine?
The status of the children of the concubine will be affected by the mother's position in the family, and there will be differences between the two.
The status of the eldest son is always higher than that of the eldest son, so only the eldest son can inherit the family property, and the children of the concubine can only watch with their eyes, and finally divide up what is left"Leftovers"。
In the film and television drama "Meet the Sister-in-law", when the protagonist was discussing the sister-in-law at school, one of them asked if there was an incompetent sister-in-law and a talented sister-in-law in the family, who should inherit the family property?
There are different opinions, but there are a few people who firmly believe that no matter how smart and talented the son of the castle lord is, he will not be able to change the fate of the castle owner's son, and the eldest son, even if he is ignorant, will inherit the family property because of the identity of the eldest son.
It is a rigid system, and the eldest son cannot be replaced by the acquired or other reasons. If the concubine does not have the honorable status of the eldest son, then what will be the result compared to the eldest son?
If you compare the concubine with the concubine, there will be a fierce conflict between the patriarchal ideology and the distinction between the concubine, and which concept will win in the end?
Actually, it is difficult to say the final outcome of this question, because the answer is not the same from different perspectives.
As for the difference between a concubine and a concubine, the status of a concubine is naturally higher than that of a concubine, and the treatment at home is also better.
However, from a patriarchal point of view, the status of concubines is naturally higher than that of concubines, so it is difficult to distinguish between the status of concubines and concubines.
But for the family, even if the eldest daughter has a high status and marries when she becomes an adult, she does not belong to the family, but the spouse of the husband.
Although the status of the commoner's son is lower, as the heir registered in his own name, he will marry a wife and have children, and the family lineage continues, and in this respect, the commoner's son has a slightly higher status than the concubine.
It would be foolish to think that these old traditions, fueled by feudalism, should be abandoned, as the pathological ideology of male superiority has created different perceptions and created a situation in which the first child is no different from the second child.
In ancient times, the concubine was higher than the concubine, and the son was higher than the woman, so who had a higher status between the concubine and the concubine?