The preferential policies under the education system have always attracted much attention, and in universities, the preferential students of the college entrance examination have caused widespread controversy. One of the forms of preferential treatment is Sino-foreign joint majors, that is, majors run by domestic universities in cooperation with foreign universities. These majors often have a low entry threshold, which has caused some students to be puzzled and complained. Shandong University, as one of the 985 engineering colleges, is also facing the problem of Sino-foreign joint students. A 985 boy at the University of Shandong was puzzled by this phenomenon. He found that some students in Sino-foreign joint majors had scores one or two hundred points lower than him, but they were able to enter the school at the same time as him. He was outraged by the unfairness and expressed his complaint online. However, his comments triggered a counterattack from Chinese and foreign co-organizers, forming a ** storm. One of the rich girls even used her rich life experience to poke the sore spot of the 985 boy, leaving him speechless. This case has aroused widespread concern and reflects some irrationality and distortion in the current education system.
Some students of the university have questioned the admission standards and admission policies of Sino-foreign joint majors in the majority of universities. They can't understand why some students are able to get into school with low grades and enjoy the same treatment. However, this skepticism often ignores an important factor, namely family background and wealth. In China's education system, family wealth often plays a decisive role in students' educational opportunities. Sino-foreign co-sponsors often come from wealthy families, and they have more opportunities to receive quality education and participate in various training courses and extracurricular activities. This background makes it easier for them to get into prestigious universities through the channels of Sino-foreign joint majors, which may make them relatively low scores in the college entrance examination. Therefore, the gaokao score is not the only criterion, family background and wealth also play a big role.
At the same time, not all students of Sino-foreign joint majors are students with low academic quality. Although their college entrance examination scores may be relatively low, they have chosen this major over other majors that are normally enrolled. These majors often require higher tuition fees, which are one of the most important aspects of the university's survival. The tuition fees of Sino-foreign joint majors are often high, some even as high as 6 or 700,000 yuan, but after graduation, they can directly obtain a diploma from a foreign university, which is quite cost-effective. This also means that students of Sino-foreign joint programs are no different from students of other majors in terms of the quality of education and the recognition of academic qualifications. They often choose Sino-foreign joint majors because they are more conducive to their career development and future planning.
However, this kind of skepticism and dissatisfaction with Sino-foreign co-operative students has also exposed some shortcomings in the education system. The current education system pays too much attention to grades and admission rates, and does not pay enough attention to the evaluation of students' other abilities and comprehensive qualities. As a result, some students of the university regard the students of Sino-foreign joint majors as "low-scoring students" or "low-level students", and have a sense of self-superiority. However, education should focus on cultivating students' comprehensive abilities and qualities, rather than one-sidedly pursuing high scores. Students of Sino-foreign joint programs have demonstrated their value through other abilities and made up for some of their shortcomings in academic aspects. It is also a reminder that the value and success of others cannot be measured simply by academic performance, everyone has their own strengths and goals, and should be proud of their choices.
To sum up, the issue of Sino-foreign joint majors under the education system has aroused extensive discussions. While some have questioned its admission criteria and admission policies, others have pointed out that family background and wealth play an important role in this process. At the same time, students in Sino-foreign joint programs are not all students with low academic qualifications, and they also consider career development and future planning when choosing Sino-foreign joint programs. The education system should focus on cultivating students' comprehensive abilities and qualities, and should not simply measure the value of individuals by academic performance. Everyone has the right to pursue their own goals and dreams, and should be respected and tolerated with each other. Taking this as an opportunity, we should reflect on the limitations of current education and promote education reform to provide fairer and better educational opportunities for every student.