Some people always want to make big news, especially the kind that panders or provokes emotions. At this time, the role of common sense and reason is very important, and we should be wary of the practice of using fake news or old news to attract attention.
In the past few days, a piece of "news" has been circulated with a screenshot of the CCTV program, saying: Compared with four years ago, China's national happiness index has increased by 4883%：
Please note: Except for the "conspicuous package" data, the content that follows is the poster's "own feeling", not released by CCTV.
In the past few days, some short ** are also talking about this.
I know and understand the thoughts of netizens when they ** this "news", but there is not necessarily the truth when there is a picture.
First of all, you can think about it: if this is the latest news, all **, since ** would have been overwhelming, right?Why are there only some whirling, vague paraphrases?
I don't believe that this happiness index news will be released recently, just as I don't believe that the *** spokesman will oppose Christmas Eve to the Battle of Changjin Lake. (Click here to review: Mao Ning did not take Christmas Eve to oppose Changjin Lake, and the CCTV ** page has been deleted).
A search reveals that "Gross National Happiness has risen by 48.""83%" is old news, which is turned out from time to time, but now it is more widely spread.
The following example is from 2022, and the year is also converted, so I have a heart:
Is it interesting to stir up old news, win traffic, deceive feelings, and waste expressions like this?
In fact, this is the news in August 2017: the School of Social Sciences of Tsinghua University and the H-Lab Happiness Technology Laboratory of Tsinghua University launched the 2017 "Happy China" Their big data research shows that compared with four years ago, China's national happiness index has increased by 4883%。
It is said that it is 2017*** but the data is from 2016, which is also normal.
This *** was released at the 4th China International Conference on Positive Psychology and the 2017 International Symposium on Positive Education.
At that time, there was no Sino-US war and the new crown epidemic, many industries had not yet thundered, and housing prices were high but not as high as they are now. People's well-being is understandably on the rise.
Time is like the Yangtze River and the Yellow River, it will not go backwards. In addition to sighing, it is more important to look forward, rather than to go back to the road of closing the country and staying in the same place. Are you right?
Finally, I would like to add a little more detail.
The title of the seminar is "2016 Happy China", which may be the original title.
Some reports say "2017 'Happy China*** This may be the title that the publisher last modified to determine."
Other reports say that in the past three years, with the continuous advancement of comprehensive deepening reforms, China's national happiness index has increased by 3994%。
Why not "4 years to raise 48."83%".
I'm more inclined to think that the difference between 3 years and 4 years is just a difference in the frame of reference.
In this *** that can be found on the Internet, the change in the happiness index is indeed 3994%, I didn't find 4883% of this data.
What the hell is going on with these two different data?I really don't know. If you have knowledgeable friends, welcome to leave a message to share, thank you!