In real life, there is inevitably the phenomenon of academic discrimination. This discrimination is not entirely unfounded, as academic background has an impact on a person's psychological advantage in certain areas. For example, Tsinghua University, a 985 university in China, has a clear difference in attitude towards undergraduate and graduate students. This distinction is not entirely unfair, as there will be more mutual understanding and communication between students from the same school. And it's not just Tsinghua University, many 985 universities have this situation. This is a norm in human society, and academic background, as a basis for people to communicate with each other, will naturally have an impact on personal socialization and resource allocation.
However, we must first accept the fact that inequality in academic qualifications is the essence of society. Whether it is the ancient imperial examination or the modern college entrance examination or postgraduate entrance examination, academic qualifications are an important entry threshold for entering society, so the various differences brought about by academic background will always exist. Of course, this does not mean that academic qualifications determine a person's fate. Just like the imperial examination in ancient times, even the imperial court ** was not all from Jinshi, and there were some examples of people successfully entering the cabinet. The same is true in modern society, where a person's success depends not only on academic qualifications, but also on personal efforts, opportunities, and overall quality. Therefore, we must not overstate the impact of academic discrimination on personal development.
Although the counterattack of the postgraduate entrance examination sounds a bit inferior, in fact, the impact of academic discrimination on the counterattacker of the postgraduate entrance examination is relatively small. In real life, the most important thing is the result, and academic background does not determine a person's achievements. The ancient imperial examination is the best example, and the disparity in social status between jinshi and shujishi is obvious, but there are also cases of successful entry into the cabinet.
For second-year students who fail to pass the college entrance examination to 985, Qingbei and other famous schools, the counterattack of the postgraduate entrance examination may indeed cause some inner discomfort, because there is still a certain degree of academic discrimination in society. However, for graduate students, the impact of academic discrimination is relatively small.
First of all, academic background does not determine a person's fate. Success in life depends on personal efforts, opportunities and overall quality, rather than relying solely on academic qualifications. In fact, many successful people are not from 985, Qingbei and other famous schools, therefore, whether you enter 985 from the second postgraduate entrance examination, or from the ordinary 985 postgraduate entrance examination into Qingbei, as long as you perform well in your work and achieve results, your academic background will gradually be noticed by people.
Secondly, there is a huge difference between the requirements for the graduate school entrance examination and the college entrance examination. The gaokao is a selection of comprehensive IQ ability, which requires the examination of the comprehensive results of various subjects, while the postgraduate entrance examination focuses more on professional courses and reduces the assessment of other subjects. Therefore, compared with the college entrance examination, the postgraduate entrance examination has higher requirements for professional ability, and the quality of the postgraduate examination results can better reflect a person's performance in their professional ability. Therefore, even if you do not achieve good results in the college entrance examination, it is entirely possible to counterattack and enter famous schools such as 985 and Qingbei if you have achieved outstanding performance in professional ability through the postgraduate entrance examination.
Finally, being discriminated against by academic qualifications doesn't mean you can't succeed in society. Although academic discrimination exists, society is complex and diverse, and efforts and opportunities can bring you unexpected opportunities and success. Just like the example of Zhang Ji, a genius teenager at Huawei, although he entered the PhD from three schools as an undergraduate, he has made great achievements at Huawei with his sensitivity to information technology and outstanding professional ability. In short, academic discrimination is a phenomenon that exists in society, but for those who go to graduate school, it is not the only factor that determines personal development. Personal efforts and quality, grasping opportunities and outstanding professional ability are the key to determining whether a person can achieve a counterattack. Academic qualifications are only a threshold for entry, and to be truly successful in society, it also depends on the overall quality and strength of the individual. Therefore, for those who are counterattacking in graduate school, they do not need to worry too much about the impact of academic discrimination, and should pay more attention to their own efforts and development, and prove their ability and value through practical actions.