After the finals of the National Chess Folk Chess Championship, the champion player YanJackie Chanat the hotelBathtubExcretion has sparked a series of controversies. According to bystanders, one of the contestants who had previously lived in the same room had also noticed the behavior. The contestants said YanJackie ChanThe behavior did exist, but out of embarrassment, it was not pointed out in person. YanJackie ChanI argue that he had to use it at 4 a.m. because he had an upset stomach after drinking two beers that dayBathtubDefecate. However, this choice has raised questions about his use of smart to cheat.
YanJackie Chan's accommodation companion did not disclose the description of the incident in detail, and he did not say it, making it difficult for the outside world to judge whether he was right or notJackie ChanSuspicious bowel movements. Even so, his observations still have a certain reference for investigating the truth of the incident.
2.Expanding: YanJackie ChanHis own interpretation of events did not dispel suspicion. Analyze his statement, toilet andBathtubThe distance between them is not far and does not choose for himBathtubProvide a good reason, especially in emergency situations, where a more convenient toilet should be preferred. Therefore, it is not unreasonable for the outside world to question his use of smart for cheating.
3.Expanding: YanJackie ChanThe existence of the so-called smart and their own use are completely denied. He said that he was a rural person, and he was very interested in this kind of highTechnologyThe product knows nothing, let alone the use of Morse Code. In addition, he expressed dissatisfaction with the fact that the organizers and hotel staff criticized him by name on a public platform, believing that it would be more appropriate to contact him privately.
After investigation, the organizers of the event confirmed YanJackie Chanat the hotelBathtubbut it is not possible to confirm whether he is cheating. Based on this, they decided to go against YanJackie ChanA fine of $100 and the forfeiture of all his prizes in the competition, including the title and a prize of $100,000. In addition, the organizers also asked for YanJackie ChanNot allowed to participate in any contest for one year.
The Henan Chess Association is also against YanJackie ChanThe punishment decision was made, requiring him to make a public apology and banning him from participating in chess tournaments in the province for one year. The penalty decision of the Chinese Chess Association is similar.
In response to the doubts of the outside world, some people have proposed a solution, that is, to give up YanJackie ChanPlayed against other players in the industry many times, especially against this tournamentThird runner-upCompete against the runner-up to verify whether he is cheating. By repeatedly dueling and observing the way he plays, he can judge YanJackie ChanWhether you have what it takes to win the championship.
Through the understanding and analysis of the events, I think YanJackie ChanWhile his actions may not have been for the purpose of cheating, his choice did leave many questions for the outside world. Whether or not he intentionally used smart to cheat, this incident has already caused him serious reputational damage and negative impact. From the whole incident, it can be seen that the issues of morality, professionalism, and public image involved behind it need to cause us to think and reflect. For similar incidents, we should raise awareness of the Code of Ethics and encourage public figures and contestants to set a good example of behavior and maintain a good public image. At the same time, the organizer of the competition should also strengthen the supervision of the activities of the participants, maintain a fair and just competition environment, and ensure the credibility and authority of the competition.