Germany is facing a severe gas shortage, which has a huge impact on the German economy and people's livelihood. In response to this dilemma, German Vice Chancellor Habeck has called on people to take less baths to save energy. He said that everyone only needs to take a shower once a week, which can save a lot of water and gas, reduce carbon emissions and protect the environment.
As soon as this proposal came out, it immediately caused an uproar, some people thought that it was a joke of politicians, some people thought that it was a manifestation of politicians' incompetence, and some people thought that it was an ignorant statement of politicians. Many people say that bathing is a basic human need, a symbol of human dignity, and a guarantee of human health, and it is impossible to give up because of energy conservation. They believe that Germany should find a way to solve the gas problem, rather than sacrificing its own quality of life.
However, it is surprising that some experts have begun to support Habeck's view, and even conducted special studies to provide a scientific basis for less bathing. They claim that it is perfectly possible to take a shower without flushing all over the body, as long as you focus on four areas: the buttocks, armpits, feet and groin, which are the most likely areas to hide dirt and dirt and need to be cleaned frequently. Wipe other parts with a damp towel, which can avoid the loss of moisture and oil, and maintain the moisture and elasticity. The expert also said that doing so could also "improve the microbiota" and enhance resistance and immunity.
As soon as the results of this study were published, many people ridiculed and resented them. They believe that this is an absurd theory, an unscientific practice, and an unhygienic Xi. They say, if you only wash four parts, the rest won't get dirty?Can I clean it with just a damp towel?Can I improve my microbiota without flushing all over my body?Not only does it not save energy, they say, but it causes more pollution and disease. They say that this will not only not protect, but will damage. Doing so, they say, not only does it not improve the quality of life, but rather reduces it.
The bathing Xi of Germans actually has a long history and culture. Germans love bathing, which they see as a way to relax and enjoy, as well as a way to be healthy and beautiful. Germans also love saunas, which they consider a way to detoxify and purify, as well as a way to socialize and communicate. The attitude of the Germans towards bathing is open and free, they do not mind bathing in public**, nor do they mind bathing with the opposite sex, they see it as a manifestation of nature and equality.
The bathing Xi of the Germans actually has practical reasons and backgrounds. Germany is a cold country with low temperatures in winter, and people need hot water to warm up and soothe. Germany is an industrialized country with poor air and water quality, and people need clean water to wash away dirt and bacteria. Germany is a busy country with a lot of stress to live and work, and people need to take a shower to relieve stress and relax.
In order to save energy, Germans actually have many other ways to save energy, instead of bathing less. They can use energy-efficient water heaters and shower heads, reducing water consumption and gas usage. They can use renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind, reducing their dependence on natural gas and their impact on the environment. They have access to more public transport and bicycles, reducing the need for gasoline and air pollution. They can use more energy-efficient lamps and appliances, reducing wasted electricity and contributing to carbon emissions.
In order to save energy, Germans also need to change their attitudes and behaviors, rather than sacrificing their standard of living. They should recognize that saving energy is not only about tackling the crisis, but also about protecting the planet and for the benefit of future generations. They should realize that saving energy is not only the responsibility of the people, but also the obligation of the people, and the choice of everyone. They should recognize that saving energy is not only a rational approach, but also a manifestation of virtue and a sign of civilization.