Recently, a report on the suspected sale of falsely advertised goods by a well-known shopping platform has attracted widespread attention from all walks of life. In this controversy, a certain sun, the president of the **chain department of the self-operated project, has become a key player. The core focus of the incident was some products labeled as "Wuchang rice", which won the love of many consumers for their excellent quality and unique taste, but also favored by unscrupulous merchants who used the reputation of "Wuchang rice" to mislead consumers into buying inferior substitutes.
The repercussions on the Internet were very strong. Consumers began to question the integrity of the shopping platform and asked for relevant information to answer their doubts. Professionals such as food safety China have also joined the investigation, making the turmoil more intense. Consumers have expressed their dissatisfaction and demanded that the fake one pay three. This serious crisis has intensified, and public anger is boiling, posing a real threat to the brand's reputation.
Highlights of similar incidents and the way in which past cases are cited can deepen the understanding of incidents. In this incident, the self-operated project that a certain Sun was responsible for before had been involved in the whirlpool many times, such as the frequent quality problems of corn products in the market, and the listing of wild shrimp that was denounced by the first businessman. Although the court ruled against the lawsuit, a certain grandson never made a public apology for this. In addition, Kiwi News, which was released last year, has never given any explanation, simply informing consumers through the customer service department that they can return the goods unconditionally.
The existence of these similar incidents has caused consumers to question the quality supervision of the shopping platform. In this incident, a certain grandson bears unshirkable responsibility. As the manager of a large listed company, he needs to face up to the seriousness of the situation and take his responsibility. He should immediately release all information related to the P5 rice and sincerely apologize to the public for the mistakes he made knowingly in an effort to hedge against the bad effects of the incident. At the same time, he should also assume the responsibility of the best person to ensure that the problem is properly dealt with and avoid damaging the credibility and subsequent development of the enterprise.
For the board, this incident is undoubtedly a wake-up call. They must deeply reflect on why similar problems arise and how to strengthen the management and supervision of self-operated projects and enterprises, so as to enhance the credibility of enterprises and win the trust of consumers.
At present, this shopping platform farce is still fermenting. As the person directly responsible for the incident, a certain grandson should assume responsibility and maintain the corporate image. At the same time, we also call on consumers to maintain rational consumption and not blindly pursue famous brands, so as not to fall into the trap of merchants. Only by working together can we build a healthy, fair and transparent market environment. What are your thoughts and suggestions on this incident?