A professor named Ma Chen made a controversial statement on the Internet, in which he boldly called for China to surrender to the United States. This view provoked widespread indignation and condemnation, but it is worth asking whether his statements are completely untenable
Professor Machen's views focus on the relationship between China's development and the United States. He claimed that China's progress was the result of U.S. handouts, but was retorted that China's success was the result of its own efforts and reforms.
The first focuses on China's achievements in the past 40 years of reform and opening up. Machen claims that this is a handout from the United States, but in fact, China has made great progress in the fields of economy, education, health care, science and technology and the environment through its own efforts.
China's economy has grown from less than 367.9 billion yuan in 1978 to 121 trillion yuan in 2022, and its per capita GDP has also grown from less than 381 yuan to nearly 90,000 yuan. This tremendous growth does not come from handouts from other countries, but from China's own development and reform. At the same time, China has made great strides in education, health care, and science and technology, all of which are the fruits of China's own efforts.
Second, Machen mentioned the economic and technological support of the United States for China, but this is not a one-sided handout, but a mutually beneficial relationship based on win-win cooperation. U.S. companies provide technology to China while also reaping market and profit returns, which promotes China's economic development.
Machen's second point focuses on the ability of the United States to control the chip industry. Although the United States is leading in chip technology, China has also made great strides in the field of research and development of chips. China is no longer completely dependent on imported chips, but has independent R&D and innovation capabilities.
Huawei, HiSilicon, Cloudwalk and other companies have achieved world-leading positions in the field of artificial intelligence chips, and have also made major breakthroughs in the field of Internet of Things chips. China's huge market demand and purchasing power also make it possible for the United States to challenge its advantages if it cannot meet the needs of the Chinese market, even if the United States is technologically advanced.
To sum up, Professor Machen's remarks failed to fully grasp China's independent efforts and development achievements. China's progress is the result of its own unremitting efforts, not the handouts of other countries. At the same time, China's rapid rise in the field of science and technology has also made it less dependent on external technology, showing a stronger ability to innovate independently.
Professor Machen's remarks have sparked widespread discussion and controversy, and his views have an important impact on China's development and international relations. This article provides a dialectical analysis of his remarks, which deserves further in-depth consideration and comment.
First, the article points out that Professor Machen's claim that China's progress is the result of U.S. handouts is a clear underestimation of China's own efforts and reforms. The rapid rise of China's economy is not only the result of its own reform and opening up policy, but also the result of the hard work of hundreds of millions of people. Since the reform and opening up in 1978, China has achieved rapid economic growth at an astonishing rate, and has made tremendous progress in many fields such as education, medical care, and science and technology. This achievement is by no means an external handout, but comes from the wisdom and efforts of the Chinese people.
Secondly, regarding the cooperative relationship between China and the United States, the article puts forward the idea of win-win cooperation. The relationship between China and the United States is not a one-sided give-and-take, but is based on the principle of mutually beneficial cooperation. U.S. companies have developed and profited in the Chinese market while providing technology to China, promoting mutually beneficial cooperation between the two economies. This model of cooperation not only promotes the growth of China's economy, but also provides an opportunity for American companies to expand their market share in the global market.
Finally, in response to Professor Ma Chen's remarks about the chip industry, the article emphasizes China's rapid rise in the field of technology. Although the United States is leading in chip technology, China has begun to make solid strides in independent R&D and innovation. A series of major breakthroughs made by Chinese companies in the field of artificial intelligence and Internet of Things chips, as well as China's huge market demand and purchasing power, have made China's competitiveness in the field of technology gradually increase. This not only reduces China's dependence on external technology, but also demonstrates China's potential for innovation and development.
Overall, Professor Machen's remarks have provoked reflection on China's development and international relations. However, the article points out the one-sidedness and limitations of his rhetoric, and highlights China's own efforts and achievements. China's continuous progress has become an important force to be reckoned with on the international stage, and this development is due to its own efforts and innovation. This article provides us with a perspective on China's development and international relations, and encourages us to look more objectively at China's rise and its role in the international arena.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!