In recent years, inside the system and outside the system have become two different models for the workplace. It is generally accepted that with the development of the times, there is more and more room for free choice of work, so the yearning for outside the system is also increasing. However, in fact, among contemporary college students, admission to public institutions is still regarded as the best destination. What is the reason behind this phenomenon?
First, the instability of the private sector has deterred many young people. The changes and uncertainties in the private sector are overwhelming, and in the face of the risk of possible unemployment, who wants to be a pawn in life rather than a master?At the same time, the benefits within the system are also enviable. The system not only encourages leaving the job to start a business, but also the benefits remain unchanged during this period, which is unimaginable in the private sector. In the private sector, even if you take sick leave, it is considered to be a delay in work, and it is difficult to enjoy the holidays and benefits stipulated by the state. In contrast, the system enjoys better work conditions and life conditions, which makes graduates yearn for it.
However, why are so many private employees not buying it and not interested in starting a business outside the system?The reasons can be analyzed from the following two aspects.
First, there is a misunderstanding of the public's perception of "no change in treatment". Although the benefits remain unchanged within six years of leaving the job and starting a business in the system, it does not mean that the salary will continue to change. In fact, this only means that the nominal salary and job title remain unchanged, and the failure of the business will not affect the promotion. This has led many people to have the illusion that they can leave their jobs to start their own businesses, believing that they can enjoy stable benefits during this time and no longer need to commute and work hard. However, the reality is that only successful entrepreneurship can obtain corresponding income, and leaving the job to start a business is only to give opportunities and support, and does not ensure a stable income.
Second, there are workplace risks and uncertainties within the system. For those who are currently satisfied with their position and treatment, leaving the system means increasing the risk of change. After all, there is no guarantee of how policies will change in the future, and if you want to come back after leaving the job, you may face many problems. In addition, there will be many risks and challenges in the process of starting a business outside the system, and for people who do not have enough confidence and entrepreneurial conditions, applying to leave the job to start a business will only face a situation of insufficient income and increased risks. Therefore, only those with a solid foundation can grasp this opportunity and enjoy the benefits of leaving their jobs to start a business.
Second, the deep meaning behind the financial pressure - the change of the financial situation in the system and the adjustment of the personnel structure.
Although the policy of encouraging people to leave their jobs and start their own businesses within the system does not have much practical impact on most ordinary migrant workers, it does reveal some trends.
First of all, the size of the staffing in the system is already not small, and there is a necessary need for reduction. This can also be corroborated by previous clean-up operations against non-staff contractors. By gradually reducing the number of non-staff contract workers, the work and activities within the system are gradually implemented to the full-time staff, so as to achieve the purpose of sizing. Therefore, the policy of leaving the job to start a business can be seen as another form of this adjustment.
Secondly, many industries outside the system are also facing development bottlenecks, and they need talents with wisdom and strength to participate in them and guide entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship can not only expand demand and increase employment, but also inject fresh impetus into the development of the industry. However, the process of starting a business has both risks and opportunities, and for small businesses and self-employed individuals with scarce funds and resources, the risks are often too great, resulting in a reluctance to take the initiative to sign up. On the other hand, talents such as university professors, while having abundant resources, may have concerns about leaving their jobs to start a business, after all, they themselves enjoy the treatment of free resources.
Through the policy of leaving the job and starting a business in the system, as well as people's reactions and attitudes, we can see that there are some deep meanings. The contrast between the different models within and outside the system reflects the different pursuits of stability and uncertainty among working people. The welfare benefits in the system and the opportunities and support for leaving the job to start a business have undoubtedly given more courage and capital to the entrepreneurs who leave the job, but not everyone has such conditions and confidence. On the other hand, the changes in the financial situation within the system and the adjustment of the personnel structure have made it necessary for the organs and units to adapt to the new development trend and adjust the personnel structure and scale in order to better meet the development requirements of the times. In the context of the development bottleneck and expanding demand of industries outside the system, talents with wisdom and strength are also needed to guide and participate in entrepreneurship and inject new vitality into the industry.
In terms of career choice, everyone has their own ideals and pursuits, whether they choose to be within or outside the system, they need to fully evaluate their own conditions and background, and examine the opportunities and risks. The off-the-job entrepreneurship policy only provides an opportunity for professionals to choose their own development path more flexibly, and the deep meaning lies in the adjustment of the financial situation within the system and the optimization of the personnel structure. The pressures and challenges that need to be faced within the system cannot be ignored, and the development outside the system also requires the participation of people with wisdom and strength. No matter which model you choose, you need to have enough confidence and strength, as well as in-depth thinking and weighing of opportunities and risks.