With the changes of the times, the career models within and outside the system have formed two different ways of working. In today's society, many college students generally believe that being admitted to a public institution is the most ideal destination. The reason for this is simple: the private sector is too volatile to ensure stable positions and salaries. In contrast, the new benefits enjoyed within the system have led to an increasing interest in the system among employees in the private sector. In recent years, more and more regional institutions have begun to encourage employees to leave their jobs and start businesses. For example, Jiangsu once encouraged civil servants to "go to the sea to start a business", which caused widespread discussion. Jiangsu**'s policy is to support civil servants with an establishment to go abroad to start a business, while retaining their original jobs and social security. Unexpectedly, Shaanxi has now promulgated a similar plan, but it is not limited to going abroad or staying at home. Regular employees of any public institution can apply to leave their posts to start a business as long as they have a business plan. In addition, Shaanxi ** extended the protection period of welfare benefits to 6 years, during which the welfare benefits remained unchanged. This has left many private sector employees feeling the huge gap between inside and outside the system. In the private sector, even if you want to take sick leave, you are often disliked for "delaying work". In contrast, state-mandated holidays and benefits are difficult to enjoy in small and medium-sized enterprises. However, within the system, there is a feeling of "being a person", and some graduates do not put in much effort when they enter public institutions, but they often feel hard about their work. Once they leave their jobs to work outside the system, it is often difficult for them to hold on for even a month. In this case, it is a very good thing for many people to be able to start a business and keep the position in the company, and the benefits will remain unchanged for 6 years. In addition, the concept of entrepreneurship is very broad and does not limit the size and size of profits. Some even hypothesize that such benefits allow people to "lie flat" and no longer have to go to work. However, the reality is often not so simple. In fact, very few people are willing to take the initiative to sign up for off-the-job entrepreneurship. The reason for this is actually quite easy to understand. First of all, the misconception that "treatment will not change" makes them suspicious. This does not mean that you can always get your original salary for six years after starting a business. However, there is also competition and uncertainty in the workplace within the system, and if the current position and salary are satisfactory, leaving means that a certain amount of risk is increased. There is no guarantee that there will be any policy changes in the future, and graduates may also be worried about other obstacles if they leave their jobs and start their own businesses. Therefore, if you do not have enough confidence and conditions to start a business, applying to leave the job to start a business is equivalent to having no stable income, and at the same time bear the risk of subsequent variables. Such benefits are more suitable for those who have a stable base to enjoy. When financial conditions are tight, there is a need for example within the system. Although the encouragement of leaving the job to start a business in the system is not closely related to most ordinary migrant workers, if we think about it carefully, we can see some of these trends. First of all, the size of the staff is actually quite large and needs to be reduced. This is in line with the previous trend of liquidating non-staff contractors. First, the number of non-staff contractors will be reduced, and then gradually these tasks will be carried out by the establishment staff, and they will no longer be as lazy as before. Encouraging off-the-job entrepreneurship is another form. Although there are very few people who are likely to sign up, eventually some may be recommended to start a business. And for those who are worried about whether they will be able to keep their original position after the failure of their business, this is also an indirect response. All of this can be an indirect reflection of the tight financial situation within the system, which cannot afford too many personnel. At the same time, many industries outside the system have also encountered development bottlenecks, and intelligent people are needed to participate in and guide entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship is also a way to expand demand and increase employment. However, entrepreneurship requires courage and capital as it does require both opportunities and risks. For people with smaller backgrounds and fewer resources, too much risk may be a reason for reluctance to sign up. For some people with a certain strength, such as university professors and scientific researchers in public institutions, they meet the conditions for starting a business. However, they themselves have access to free resources, and if they choose to leave their jobs to start their own businesses, they may not be able to accept this change.
There are some deep meanings behind this phenomenon. First of all, behind the encouragement of leaving the job to start a business in the system, it means that the institutions in the system need to be adjusted and optimized to a certain extent. The reduction in the size of the staffing is of great significance for the system. By encouraging off-the-job entrepreneurship, the number of staff can be selectively reduced, and the internal optimization of the organization can be achieved to improve work efficiency. Secondly, leaving the post to start a business is an important support and guidance for industries outside the system. Industries outside the system are facing some difficulties in their development, and they need experienced and capable people to participate in entrepreneurship and lead the industry out of the predicament and lead the development of the industry. By encouraging employees in the system to participate in off-the-job entrepreneurship, more intellectual and resource support can be provided for industries outside the system. Thirdly, entrepreneurship is a way to expand demand and increase employment. With the development of the economy, the issue of employment has always been the focus of social attention. By encouraging people to leave their jobs and start their own businesses, we can boost the employment rate and promote economic development. However, starting a business also comes with risks, which require a certain amount of courage and capital. Only those with certain strength and conditions can take such risks. Therefore, the policy of encouraging off-the-job entrepreneurship is more suitable for those with better backgrounds and more abundant resources. Finally, the encouragement of leaving the job to start a business within the system also implies a tight financial situation within the system. Institutions within the system need to be financially compressed and can no longer afford excessive staff costs. Therefore, encouraging off-the-job entrepreneurship can indirectly promote the reduction of personnel in the system and achieve the purpose of financial adjustment.
In summary, the different working models within and outside the system have gradually increased people's freedom of career choice. There are some deep meanings behind the phenomenon of encouraging off-the-job entrepreneurship in the system: the institutions in the system need to be adjusted and optimized;Industries outside the system need the support and guidance of employees within the system;Entrepreneurship is a way to expand demand and increase employment;The financial situation within the system needs to be adjusted. This phenomenon is of great significance for social development and employment issues, but it also needs to take into account the risks and constraints of entrepreneurship.