Recently, the well-known entrepreneur Dong Mingzhu has been on the hot search again, and at first I thought it was a follow-up to your relationship with Meng Yutong, thinking that this is too boring.
As a result, when I opened my eyes, I found that it was not, it was Dong Mingzhu's previous work that became popular again.
Here's the thing, in an interview in March this year, Dong Mingzhu suggested such legislation to charge protection fees for the behavior of employees who change jobs. At that time, she said this: "You have worked with me for more than ten years, I have cultivated you, I have paid so much financial, material, human and time, you pat your ass and leave, then your next unit will at least compensate me for my training fees." ”
To be honest, this logic is indeed something that most people have never seen before. However, it also reflects Dong Mingzhu's traditional thinking as a manager of a manufacturing enterprise, that is, to compress labor costs to the extreme, and compress the value of people to the extreme.
Her views reflect a strong antipathy towards employee job hopping, especially after employees have been nurtured by the company for a long time. This situation is actually common in today's workplace environment, but Dong Mingzhu's solution is quite extreme.
Dong Mingzhu's "training fee" is actually a restriction on the free movement of employees. Judging by her remarks, she may have thought that this practice may be to protect the investment of the business. After all, she thinks that a newcomer will not know anything when he comes, and he has learned everything to leave with me, so I don't have a loss?
But from an employee's point of view, this is outrageous, and logically untenable. Because recruiting new people or experienced employees, this is the freedom of your business, but if you choose to recruit new people, it means that you want to reduce costs. Then since you have benefits, now that others have left their jobs and said that they want to pay for training, isn't it both necessary and demanding?How can there be such a good thing!As a mature entrepreneur, it is indeed very explosive to be able to say this.
Let's talk about Dong Mingzhu's views on modern young people. In the live broadcast, she expressed concern about the freedom and unruliness of young people. This kind of rhetoric seems to put all young people under a negative stereotype. This one-size-fits-all approach ignores the diversity of the younger generation and the unique challenges they face in modern society.
Of course, we can't ignore the stimulation of Dong Mingzhu by the Meng Yutong incident. The way she handled the matter also exposed some problems in her concept of employing people. In this case, she emphasized the importance of personal choices and values, but her remarks did not seem to be completely consistent, perhaps more flexible.
In addition, Dong Mingzhu's remarks also exposed the deep contradictions between enterprise bosses and workers. Bosses often seek to maximize profits, and this sometimes comes at the expense of their employees. This unequal power structure is fully reflected in Dong Mingzhu's rhetoric.
If you want me to say, Dong Mingzhu should go back and manage the company well. If you really want to be an Internet celebrity, don't be so daddy. Maybe you don't owe anything to Gree employees, but the pattern of performance is too small. You can learn from Lei Jun, don't teach young people to do things.