Text: The future is very good, and the editor has a good future.
Recently, as a central-level official media, the reporter of "Half Moon Talk" has taken the responsibility and mission of "shouldering morality with iron shoulders and writing for the people's livelihood", and has gone deep into the grassroots to conduct investigations, go through doors to find out the truth, and seek truth from facts"Out of the people's livelihood", "talk" out of the "new height" of democratic feelings.
As everyone knows, news is about the words "new and substantial," and speaking with facts should be said to be the essential characteristic of news. The main reason why several reports of "Half Moon Talk" have been able to be supported and praised by the public is because as a first-level party, it can sincerely take the people's livelihood as its responsibility, and boldly speak out for the people from the perspective of democratic concerns everywhere, which has moved the people's feelings.
First of all, the courage and spirit of the reporter of "Half Moon Talk" in interviewing and reporting on the reality that the salary expenditure of the financial support personnel of County A in the Wumeng Mountains exceeded the county's tax revenue by nearly 5 times, which aroused the public's attention. How touching is it to the hearts of the people?
Secondly, in another report exposing the chaos in the industry, "Half Moon Talk" objectively and calmly analyzed the root causes behind its existing problems from another angle, and also analyzed the root causes of its problems in an easy-to-understand narrative.
When exposing the chaos in the industry, "Half Moon Talk" hit the nail on the head to expose the fact that the over-supervision of financial support personnel has become the best killer.
The article pointed out that some industries such as entertainment, electric vehicles, environmental protection, automobiles, hawker stalls, and rural farming are subject to strict supervision. However, these regulations are not entirely due to the development needs of the industry itself, but due to the employment of a large number of financial support personnel. The wages of these financial supporters are the most important for the people to pay taxes, but the excessive supervision they carry out has brought real pain to the people. Here, how well does the reporter's analysis of these contradictions and complex relationships be in place? How close to the people?
The author believes that the common people have long hated and resented those literary styles that sing praises all the way and dance red flags everywhere. It is conceivable that the people can welcome the nib-tip formalism of "seeing flowers but not weeds" everywhere by "diving" people's feelings, "injecting water" into data, and "shrinking" problems? Can these alienated reports help policymakers? I am afraid that in the end, it will only bring "misleading" and lead to "trouble", but in fact, this kind of "duckweed-style" reporting is harmful to the country and the people. It should be said that daring to expose shortcomings is also an indispensable form of expression for publicizing positive social energy.
The above views, whether they are correct or not, welcome everyone to criticize and correct in the comment area, express their opinions and communicate with each other!
Disclaimer: The article aims to promote positive social energy, the information comes from the official **, from the Internet, the author has no rhythm, and there is no attack or slander, just reasoning and commenting. If copyright or infringement is involved, the contact will be deleted, and I do not assume any direct and indirect legal responsibility. ）