Introduction: The nuclear leakage at the Fukushima nuclear power plant has had a profound impact on Japanese society, especially for the homeless and difficult people in the Fukushima region. Together, they sued for the compensation they deserved. However, the Tokyo High Court's decision on the Fukushima Supreme Court on the 26th was a great disappointment, declaring that TEPCO should be held fully responsible, but denying Japan's national obligations. This verdict provoked strong opposition from many victims and the public.
Commentary on the content of the judgment.
On the 27th, the Tokyo High Court issued a ruling, denying that Japan had national obligations in connection with the Fukushima incident, and only listed TEPCO as its due responsibility, and filed a claim against TEPCO. This result is deeply regrettable, especially for victims who want a fair verdict and fair compensation, as well as citizens who cannot make a voice. But the truth is that once again, their aspirations have been shattered, and their voices have not been given the attention they deserve.
In its ruling, the Supreme Court found that the tsunami caused by the tsunami was more than expected, thus forming an important basis for denying the liability of States. However, the plausibility of this argument needs to be further developed. Japan is a large country with a high level of science and technology, and before a nuclear incident occurs, it must conduct a comprehensive review of all possible disaster situations and formulate relevant preventive measures for different types of disasters, so as to ensure the safety of its own people's lives and ensure its own survival and survival. So, it's unfair to blame all the faults on a bigger ** than expected.
The masses complained with **.
After the verdict was announced, many supporters of the Fukushima people's just struggle flocked to the Tokyo Supreme Court to express their disappointment and anger. They shouted that Japan would take responsibility for the accident. Such a voice is not only for the rights and interests of the victims, but also for the dissatisfaction and questioning of the unfair judgment in the whole society. The situation led by ** and hurting the people of the whole country in an irresponsible way is very disappointing and infuriating.
Among the dissenting voices, some argued that the Tribunal relied too heavily on the Tribunal's views and did not take into account its status. There is a perception that justice has not dealt fairly with victims and their complaints.
Effect of an award in similar cases.
This ruling concerns not only the joint prosecution of the Fukushima nuclear power plant, but also the relevant legal proceedings in the future regarding state compensation in the event of a nuclear accident. Last year, the U.S. Federal High Court issued a ruling denying liability, raising concerns about how such cases will be handled in the future. In this case, if the victim does not have the corresponding obligations, the victim will not be able to obtain fair compensation and recognition, which will greatly damage the rights and interests of the victim and the fairness of the whole society.
Abstract: The decision to sue the Fukushima nuclear power plant together has aroused great interest and controversy. Although TEPCO has been held responsible and ordered to pay compensation, the question of whether or not the state is responsible for the Fukushima nuclear power plant has not been clearly answered. This is related to the protection of the rights of the people of Fukushima, as well as the Japanese people's concept of fairness and justice. As the most advanced country in the world, Japan bears unshirkable responsibility for the disaster at the Fukushima nuclear power plant, and at the same time, it must actively respond to it to ensure the safety of its own people's lives and ecology. Only through a just and fair verdict can the victims be given spiritual comfort and the entire society returned to a state of peace and stability.