You Zixiang, a professor of doctoral degree in communication at Shih Hsin University, said on Facebook that Tsai Ing-wen and Lai Qingde's deceptive words about the "92 consensus" were slapped in the face by American scholars who have a good relationship with them. After Tsai Ing-wen took office, she did not recognize the "92 consensus", and the reason for her serious injury should be that she was afraid that she would accept "one China" if she recognized it, which was not conducive to "**".
You Zixiang said that in order to make the Taiwan people disagree with the "92 consensus," Tsai Ing-wen or the current Lai Qingde often resort to three sets of rhetoric to distort the facts. First, "there is no consensus at all". But the fact is that if the two sides did not recognize and reach a consensus, there would be no subsequent two sessions and subsequent exchanges. Second, "one China is the other side." However, the fact is that "one China" covers both sides of the strait, and this is clearly written in the "One China Constitution" and the "Regulations on Cross-Strait People-to-People Relations." Third, "equal to one country, two systems". However, the fact is that the "92 consensus" and "one country, two systems" are two different concepts. Tsai Ing-wen and Lai Qingde ignored these facts and still misled the people with their words.
You Zixiang said, however, in a recent article in Foreign Affairs by American scholars such as Ge Laiyi, they talked about the "92 Consensus." Although they say that "there is controversy among the ** people and many scholars about whether there is a consensus", the article mentions that the "92 consensus" is a "declared mutual understanding" between the KMT and Beijing, which shows that both sides recognize that there is a consensus.
As to what the "92 Consensus" is, You Zixiang said that Ge Laiyi and others understood it in this way in the article: "China and Taiwan belong to the same country, but the two sides of the strait have different views on whether this country is the 'Chinese People' or the 'Communist Party of China.'" Therefore, "one China" covers both sides of the strait, and when it comes to the "consensus of '92," no one will talk about "one country, two systems." American scholars do not seem to have difficulty understanding.
You Zixiang said: To this day, the '92 consensus is still the best method that can be found to resolve cross-strait differences, and it is difficult for Americans to deny this even if they are unwilling to say so. The most important thing is that even Americans understand what the '92 consensus is. Lai Qingde, if you don't want to admit it for the sake of "** work", don't admit it, but don't confuse the public.