Thousands of years of strife are a dime, and the poor life experience is in vain. No one spoke to Liu Xuande, asking for the highest meaning of the field. This is Wang Anshi's description of Liu Bei in "Reading Shu Zhi", but it hides a deep mystery of history. In the Romance of the Three Kingdoms and the official history "Romance of the Three Kingdoms", Liu Bei gives people the impression of hypocrisy and falsehood, a subtle feeling that is difficult to express.
However, it is undeniable that in that period of parallel regimes, Liu Bei was indeed the hardest working one. Sun Quan's family has been entrenched in Jiangdong for generations, and after Cao Cao had eunuchs, Liu Bei relied on his own struggle without any practical help to fight for territory step by step.
Liu Bei was exiled for half his life, and finally seized Shu and Hanzhong in his old age, and was crowned emperor in 221 AD. The regime he established was Xi called Shu Han by later generations, but history may not be as simple as we think.
In 220 AD, Cao Pi forced Liu Xie to abdicate, proclaimed himself emperor and established the state of Wei. In order to continue the Han dynasty, Liu Bei established another state called Han in Shu. After Liu Bei himself was the king of Zhongshan, Liu Xie called him the emperor's uncle and was qualified to inherit the legal system of the Han Dynasty. However, due to the huge power of Cao Wei, the orthodox Han dynasty had perished at Liu Xie's office.
In order to distinguish it from the orthodox Han Dynasty, later generations added the word "Shu" in front of the Han Kingdom established by Liu Bei and became the Shu Han. However, Liu Bei himself and the Shu Han courtiers never considered themselves "Shu Han", and their official title was always "Han".
In Zhuge Liang's list of teachers, we can only read in his pen words such as "The Long of the Han Dynasty, You Can Count the Days and Wait for You", "Revive the Han Dynasty, Return to the Old Capital" and other words, proving that they never considered themselves "Shu Han".
The goal of Liu Bei's struggle was to revive the Han dynasty and the Central Plains in the north, and to claim to be orthodox in the Han Dynasty. Therefore, if their country name is "Shu", it is tantamount to admitting that they are a secessionist regime in a corner of peace. Liu Bei's nickname is "Emperor Zhaolie of the Han Dynasty", which also indicates that the country name of his regime is Han.
Although the Ji Han established by Liu Bei had little to do with the Han Dynasty and was limited to the southwestern frontier, it is reasonable for people to distinguish the "Shu Han" from the orthodox Han dynasty. However, when studying Xi history, we should pay attention to distinguishing between real history and erroneous perceptions, and not fall into misunderstandings in discussions.
Although Liu Bei's life has left many questions and controversies in history, his hard work is also worth pondering. He started his business in troubled times and eventually established a regime, which has a profound impact on the understanding of the history and people of the Three Kingdoms, as well as our understanding of history.
Liu Bei analyzes the historical truth and reveals the real name of his founding country!This article profoundly analyzes Liu Bei's political journey during the Three Kingdoms period and the true face of the Ji and Han regimes he established. Through the study of historical materials and the analysis of historical events, the article reveals that the real name of the country founded by Liu Bei is "Han", not the "Shu Han" as Xi is called.
First of all, the article uses the poems in Wang Anshi's "Reading Shu Zhi" as an introduction to arouse readers' thoughts about Liu Bei. The author not only expressed his views on Liu Bei, but also began with "A Thousand Years of Disputes and Share", showing Liu Bei's upheaval and wandering half of his life, laying out a deep and fascinating historical picture for readers.
Secondly, through the comparison of the three main rulers of Liu Bei, Cao Cao, and Sun Quan, the article highlights Liu Bei's arduous journey of relying on personal efforts to move around the country and finally seize the territory without the support of a generational foundation and the support of his father and brother. This positive portrayal of Liu Bei's hard work makes the reader's evaluation of Liu Bei gradually complicated in the text.
Then, through the review of Liu Bei's founding process, the article gradually reveals the truth of the national name of "Shu Han". After Cao Pi forced Liu Xie to abdicate in 220 AD, Liu Bei established a state called "Han" in Shu in order to continue the Han Dynasty, showing the author's in-depth understanding of the historical background. This method of historical research makes the argument of the article more convincing.
In the second half of the article, through the analysis of the epithet, the author once again emphasizes that the name of Liu Bei's regime should be "Han", and points out that "Shu Han" is only a title added by later generations to distinguish the orthodox Han family. This point of view subverts the general public's perception of "Shu Han" and triggers readers' thinking about the historical truth.
Finally, the article returns to Liu Bei's life's struggle in a summary way, emphasizing the far-reaching impact of his entrepreneurial experience in troubled times on the understanding of the history and characters of the Three Kingdoms. The whole article has clear logic and clear views, and through the excavation of historical details, it presents readers with a more realistic and multi-dimensional image of Liu Bei.
Overall, this review is a positive response to "Liu Bei: Analysis of Historical Truth, Revealing the True Name of His Founding of the People's Republic of China!is not only a recognition of Liu Bei, a historical figure, but also a useful enlightenment for historical interpretation.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!